Moran Mayo (40 results)

Hardcover/Pappeinband. Condition: Sehr gut. 471 p. Very good. Shrink wrapped. Without dust jacket. Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 890.

2nd ed. 15 x 23 cm. 471 pages. Paperback. Versand aus Deutschland / We dispatch from Germany via Air Mail. Einband bestoßen, daher Mängelexemplar gestempelt, sonst sehr guter Zustand. Imperfect copy due to slightly bumped cover, apart from this in very good condition. Stamped. Sprache: Englisch.

Paperback. Condition: Very Good. Inscribed "Best Wishes, David" on half title. No other makings. Minor cover wear. Always securely packed. Professional booksellers since 1994. Satisfaction guaranteed.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: Very Good. Cover has light scratches. Some outer edges have minor scuffs. Previous owners name stamp on first page. Book content is in new condition.

Condition: New.

Hardback. Condition: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condition: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,850grams, ISBN:9780802038081.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 280 pages. 6.14x0.75x9.21 inches. In Stock.

Condition: New.

Condition: very god. Dust Jacket Condition: no dustjacket. 8vo pp.471. book.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: New.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: New. 'Rethinking the Reasonable Person' investigates whether there are deeper foundations to criticisms of whether the "reasonable person" concept presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and therefore may discriminate against certain classes of defendant, discussing how the legal standard might be reconstructed in a more egalitarian way. Num Pages: 364 pages, bibliography. BIC Classification: JKV; LAB; LNF; LNV. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 240 x 166 x 25. Weight in Grams: 660. . 2003. hardcover. . . . .

Hardback. Condition: New. The reasonable person standard plays a central role in the law, figuring prominently in tort law, criminal law, and administrative law. However the reasonable person has also attracted substantial criticism from egalitarian critics and feminists insofar as it presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and may discriminate against certain classes of defendant. Judges and mainstream theorists also increasingly puzzle over what the standard amounts to and how to apply it. Using these controversies as a point of departure, Rethinking the Reasonable Person examines the promise and the perils of the reasonable person standard. Ultimately, it argues that an objective standard is not only defensible but essential. Yet only with a radical reconstruction will it be possible to realize the promise of the standard and to ensure a truly egalitarian conception of responsibility.

Condition: New. 'Rethinking the Reasonable Person' investigates whether there are deeper foundations to criticisms of whether the "reasonable person" concept presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and therefore may discriminate against certain classes of defendant, discussing how the legal standard might be reconstructed in a more egalitarian way. Num Pages: 364 pages, bibliography. BIC Classification: JKV; LAB; LNF; LNV. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 240 x 166 x 25. Weight in Grams: 660. . 2003. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. The reasonable person standard plays a central role in the law, figuring prominently in tort law, criminal law, and administrative law. However the reasonable person has also attracted substantial criticism from egalitarian critics and feminists insofar as it presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and may discriminate against certain classes of defendant. Judges and mainstream theorists also increasingly puzzle over what the standard amounts to and howto apply it. Using these controversies as a point of departure, Rethinking the Reasonable Person examines the promise and the perils of the reasonable person standard. Ultimately, it argues that anobjective standard is not only defensible but essential. Yet only with a radical reconstruction will it be possible to realize the promise of the standard and to ensure a truly egalitarian conception of responsibility. The 'reasonable person' is used to assess the acceptability of behaviour in many areas of the law including criminal law and accident law. Rethinking the Reasonable Person investigates whether there are deeper foundations to these criticisms and discusses how the legal standard might be reconstructed in a more egalitarian way. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

hardcover. Condition: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Hardback. Condition: New. The reasonable person standard plays a central role in the law, figuring prominently in tort law, criminal law, and administrative law. However the reasonable person has also attracted substantial criticism from egalitarian critics and feminists insofar as it presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and may discriminate against certain classes of defendant. Judges and mainstream theorists also increasingly puzzle over what the standard amounts to and how to apply it. Using these controversies as a point of departure, Rethinking the Reasonable Person examines the promise and the perils of the reasonable person standard. Ultimately, it argues that an objective standard is not only defensible but essential. Yet only with a radical reconstruction will it be possible to realize the promise of the standard and to ensure a truly egalitarian conception of responsibility.

Hardcover. Condition: new. New Copy. Customer Service Guaranteed.

Hardcover. Condition: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

hardcover. Condition: New. NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Condition: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. Once considered implausible, the demand to make amends for old wrongs has become a pressing contemporary problem. Legal expert Professor Mayo Moran utilizes landmark cases to demonstrate how innovative private law claims have begun to employ reparative justice to frame claims to redress grievous historical wrongs, tracing the evolution from early Holocaust litigation and transitional justice to contemporary claims involving colonial violence, slavery, andinstitutional abuse.Drawing on ground-breaking cases involving looted art, institutional child abuse, and involuntary sterilization, the book highlights the shifting understanding of thepast. It examines the pivotal role of private law in the effort to rectify historical injustices. Post-Holocaust legal developments, the rise of transitional justice, and the strategic use of domestic civil law by human rights advocates helped to shape these novel redress claims. Moved by survivor narratives and in the face of evolving legal norms, courts, governments, and institutions all began to consider how to respond to grievous old wrongs.Moran analyzes the designof redress mechanisms and the key role of legal practitioners, showing how jurisdictions have responded through settlements and compensation programs. Using a wide array of examples, Moran outlines thepitfalls and opportunities of law as a tool for addressing past wrongs. From the Holocaust to eugenics, colonial violence, slavery and looted belongings, victims of historical wrongs are demanding justice. Making Amends for Historic Wrongs charts the rise of redress for historic injustice, pointing to key lessons for the future. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. Once considered implausible, the demand to make amends for old wrongs has become a pressing contemporary problem. Legal expert Professor Mayo Moran utilizes landmark cases to demonstrate how innovative private law claims have begun to employ reparative justice to frame claims to redress grievous historical wrongs, tracing the evolution from early Holocaust litigation and transitional justice to contemporary claims involving colonial violence, slavery, andinstitutional abuse.Drawing on ground-breaking cases involving looted art, institutional child abuse, and involuntary sterilization, the book highlights the shifting understanding of thepast. It examines the pivotal role of private law in the effort to rectify historical injustices. Post-Holocaust legal developments, the rise of transitional justice, and the strategic use of domestic civil law by human rights advocates helped to shape these novel redress claims. Moved by survivor narratives and in the face of evolving legal norms, courts, governments, and institutions all began to consider how to respond to grievous old wrongs.Moran analyzes the designof redress mechanisms and the key role of legal practitioners, showing how jurisdictions have responded through settlements and compensation programs. Using a wide array of examples, Moran outlines thepitfalls and opportunities of law as a tool for addressing past wrongs. From the Holocaust to eugenics, colonial violence, slavery and looted belongings, victims of historical wrongs are demanding justice. Making Amends for Historic Wrongs charts the rise of redress for historic injustice, pointing to key lessons for the future. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. The reasonable person standard plays a central role in the law, figuring prominently in tort law, criminal law, and administrative law. However the reasonable person has also attracted substantial criticism from egalitarian critics and feminists insofar as it presupposes contested notions of 'normal' behaviour and may discriminate against certain classes of defendant. Judges and mainstream theorists also increasingly puzzle over what the standard amounts to and howto apply it. Using these controversies as a point of departure, Rethinking the Reasonable Person examines the promise and the perils of the reasonable person standard. Ultimately, it argues that anobjective standard is not only defensible but essential. Yet only with a radical reconstruction will it be possible to realize the promise of the standard and to ensure a truly egalitarian conception of responsibility. The 'reasonable person' is used to assess the acceptability of behaviour in many areas of the law including criminal law and accident law. Rethinking the Reasonable Person investigates whether there are deeper foundations to these criticisms and discusses how the legal standard might be reconstructed in a more egalitarian way. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.