Gestel Rob (88 results)

Condition: Good. VG condition book without dust jacket. Boards are clean with little wear. Book has clean and bright contents.

Hardcover. Condition: As New. Dust Jacket Condition: No Dust Jacket As Issued. Text clean and tight; no dust jacket; 9.09 X 6.30 X 1.42 inches; 558 pages.

Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: New. Although American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences? What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization.…

Paperback. Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: New.

Condition: New. 2018. Reprint. Paperback. . . . . .

Condition: New. In English.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 1st reprint edition. 557 pages. 9.06x5.91x1.22 inches. In Stock.

Condition: New. 2018. Reprint. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 1st reprint edition. 557 pages. 9.06x5.91x1.22 inches. In Stock.

Condition: New. This book aims to spur a debate about the role of methodology in legal scholarship and legal education, since there appears to be a growing divide between legal practice and academic legal writing on the one hand and between traditional normative scholarshi.

Condition: New.

Condition: New.

Condition: very good. Den Haag : Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2006. Paperback. xii,220 pp. (Onderzoekschool voor Wetgevingsvraagstukken / Schoordijk Instituut). Inhoud : Rob van Gestel & Philip Eijlander. Domeinconflicten tussen Europees en nationaal toezicht. -- C.J.C.F. Fijnaut & D. van Daele. De fraudebestrijding in het spanningsveld tussen de nationale en communautaire rechtshandhaving. C.J.C.F. Fijnaut en D. van Daele. -- Saskia Lavrijsen & Leigh Hancher. De rol van de netwerken van nationale mededeingingstoezichthouders bij de bevordering van good governance in de Europese Unie. -- Rob van Gestel & Philip Eijlander. Oprichting van de European Maritime Safety Agency : een nieuwe Octopus in de zee van toezichthouders? -- Adrienne de Moor-van Vugt. Europese criteria voor milieutoezicht. -- Bernd van der Meulen & Marieke Lugt. Handhaving van levensmiddelenrecht. -- Rob van Gestel & Philip Eijlander. Europees toezicht : partnerschap of alleenheerschappij. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9789054546450. Keywords : RECHT, staats- & bestuursrecht.…

Condition: New.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Although American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization.…

Condition: New.

HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: new.

Paperback. Condition: New. Although American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences? What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization.…

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In English.

Condition: New. 2025. hardcover. . . . . .

Condition: New. 2026. hardcover. . . . . .

HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 400 pages. 9.25x6.12 inches. In Stock.

Hardback. Condition: New. This timely book examines the increasing pressure on courts to protect underrepresented matters of public interest at the risk of political reprisals. Rob van Gestel provides critical insights into the role of courts amidst the escalating global trend of the judicialization of politics due to ineffective government legislatures. The book illustrates that courts cannot avoid policy-making in public interest cases, and demonstrates that the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking in these instances extends beyond a correct interpretation of the law.Chapters explore the different strategies used by judges across jurisdictions in Europe, the USA, India and South Africa to legitimize their decisions in contentious public interest cases. He discusses a number of global landmark cases, including the Urgenda Climate Case in the Netherlands and the Treatment Action Campaign Case on the prevention of HIV transmissions in South Africa.NGOs and lawyers engaging in public research litigation will greatly benefit from this insightful book, as will scholars who are interested in methods of judicial lawmaking. This book will also be a vital resource for judges, students and political scientists alike.…

Condition: New.