Phonological Parsing Speech Recognition by Church (17 results)

Condition: Muy bueno. : Este libro, 'Phonological Parsing in Speech Recognition', explora las diferentes realizaciones acústicas de los fonemas según el contexto. El autor, Kenneth Ward Church, examina cómo estas variaciones pueden ser problemáticas para el reconocimiento del habla y propone soluciones basadas en el análisis fonológico. Publicado por Kluwer Academic Publishers, este libro es una valiosa contribución al campo de la ingeniería y la ciencia de la computación. EAN: 9780898382501 Tipo: Libros Categoría: Tecnología|Ciencias Título: Phonological Parsing in Speech Recognition Autor: Kenneth Ward Church Editorial: Kluwer Academic Publishers Idioma: en Páginas: 272 Formato: tapa dura.

Hardcover. Ex-library with stamp and library-signature. GOOD condition, some traces of use. Ancien Exemplaire de bibliothèque avec signature et cachet. BON état, quelques traces d'usure. Ehem. Bibliotheksexemplar mit Signatur und Stempel. GUTER Zustand, ein paar Gebrauchsspuren. C 427 9780898382501 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 1150.

Hardcover. Condition: Good. hardback in good condition.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Hardcover textbook in Very Good condition. Name written in the front on three pages. Clean pages. Good binding. Minimal wear to the exterior. Carefully packaged to avoid damage in shipping.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Ex-Library hardcover in very nice condition with the usual markings and attachments. Rough along top edge. Except for library markings, interior clean and unmarked. Tight binding.

Condition: New. In.

Condition: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - It is well-known that phonemes have different acoustic realizations depending on the context. Thus, for example, the phoneme /t! is typically realized with a heavily aspirated strong burst at the beginning of a syllable as in the word Tom, but without a burst at the end of a syllable in a word like cat. Variation such as this is often considered to be problematic for speech recogni tion: (1) 'In most systems for sentence recognition, such modifications must be viewed as a kind of 'noise' that makes it more difficult to hypothesize lexical candidates given an in put phonetic transcription. To see that this must be the case, we note that each phonological rule (in a certain example) results in irreversible ambiguity-the phonological rule does not have a unique inverse that could be used to recover the underlying phonemic representation for a lexical item. For example, . . . schwa vowels could be the first vowel in a word like 'about' or the surface realization of almost any English vowel appearing in a sufficiently destressed word. The tongue flap (.) could have come from a /t! or a /d/. ' (65, pp. 548 - 549) This view of allophonic variation is representative of much of the speech recognition literature, especially during the late 1970's. One can find similar statements by Cole and Jakimik (22) and by Jelinek (50).

Condition: New. pp. 286.

Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: Like New. Like New. book.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -It is well-known that phonemes have different acoustic realizations depending on the context. Thus, for example, the phoneme /t! is typically realized with a heavily aspirated strong burst at the beginning of a syllable as in the word Tom, but without a burst at the end of a syllable in a word like cat. Variation such as this is often considered to be problematic for speech recogni tion: (1) 'In most systems for sentence recognition, such modifications must be viewed as a kind of 'noise' that makes it more difficult to hypothesize lexical candidates given an in put phonetic transcription. To see that this must be the case, we note that each phonological rule (in a certain example) results in irreversible ambiguity-the phonological rule does not have a unique inverse that could be used to recover the underlying phonemic representation for a lexical item. For example, . . . schwa vowels could be the first vowel in a word like 'about' or the surface realization of almost any English vowel appearing in a sufficiently destressed word. The tongue flap (.) could have come from a /t! or a /d/. ' (65, pp. 548 - 549) This view of allophonic variation is representative of much of the speech recognition literature, especially during the late 1970's. One can find similar statements by Cole and Jakimik (22) and by Jelinek (50). 284 pp. Englisch.

Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. It is well-known that phonemes have different acoustic realizations depending on the context. Thus, for example, the phoneme /t! is typically realized with a heavily aspirated strong burst at the beginning of a syllable as in the word Tom, but without a bur.

Paperback / softback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 544.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -It is well-known that phonemes have different acoustic realizations depending on the context. Thus, for example, the phoneme /t! is typically realized with a heavily aspirated strong burst at the beginning of a syllable as in the word Tom, but without a burst at the end of a syllable in a word like cat. Variation such as this is often considered to be problematic for speech recogni tion: (1) 'In most systems for sentence recognition, such modifications must be viewed as a kind of 'noise' that makes it more difficult to hypothesize lexical candidates given an in put phonetic transcription. To see that this must be the case, we note that each phonological rule [in a certain example] results in irreversible ambiguity-the phonological rule does not have a unique inverse that could be used to recover the underlying phonemic representation for a lexical item. For example, . . . schwa vowels could be the first vowel in a word like 'about' or the surface realization of almost any English vowel appearing in a sufficiently destressed word. The tongue flap [(] could have come from a /t! or a /d/. ' [65, pp. 548-549] This view of allophonic variation is representative of much of the speech recognition literature, especially during the late 1970's. One can find similar statements by Cole and Jakimik [22] and by Jelinek [50].Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 284 pp. Englisch.

Condition: New. Print on Demand pp. 286 66:B&W 7 x 10 in or 254 x 178 mm Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam.

Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 286.