9781107024021 - Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law Asil Studies in International Legal Theory (16 results)

Condition: New.

Hardcover. Condition: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Condition: New. In.

Condition: New. Leading legal, political and moral theorists discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. Editor(s): May, Larry; Forcehimes, Andrew. Series: ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory. Num Pages: 282 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LBBS. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 234 x 154 x 20. Weight in Grams: 514. . 2012. Hardback. . . . .

Condition: New. pp. 282.

Condition: New. Leading legal, political and moral theorists discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. Editor(s): May, Larry; Forcehimes, Andrew. Series: ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory. Num Pages: 282 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LBBS. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 234 x 154 x 20. Weight in Grams: 514. . 2012. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 1st edition. 292 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. In the transition from war, mass atrocity or a repressive regime, how should we regard the idea of democracy and human rights Should regimes be toppled unless they are democratic or is it sufficient that these regimes are less repressive than before Are there moral reasons for thinking that soldiers should be relieved of responsibility so as to advance the goal of peace building And how should we regard the often conflicting goals of telling the truth about what occurred in the past and allowing individuals to have their day in court These questions and more are analyzed in detail. It also explores whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. In the transition from war, mass atrocity or a repressive regime, how should we regard the idea of democracy and human rights? Should regimes be toppled unless they are democratic or is it sufficient that these regimes are less repressive than before? Are there moral reasons for thinking that soldiers should be relieved of responsibility so as to advance the goal of peace building? And how should we regard the often conflicting goals of telling the truth about what occurred in the past and allowing individuals to have their day in court? These questions and more are analyzed in detail. It also explores whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. The volume questions whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 1st edition. 292 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Hardback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. In the transition from war, mass atrocity or a repressive regime, how should we regard the idea of democracy and human rights? Should regimes be toppled unless they are democratic or is it sufficient that these regimes are less repressive than before? Are there moral reasons for thinking that soldiers should be relieved of responsibility so as to advance the goal of peace building? And how should we regard the often conflicting goals of telling the truth about what occurred in the past and allowing individuals to have their day in court? These questions and more are analyzed in detail. It also explores whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. The volume questions whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Gebunden. Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. The volume questions whether jus post bellum itself shou.

Condition: New. Print on Demand pp. 282 14:B&W 6 x 9 in or 229 x 152 mm Case Laminate on White w/Gloss Lam.

Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 282.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss the normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. In the transition from war, mass atrocity or a repressive regime, how should we regard the idea of democracy and human rights? Should regimes be toppled unless they are democratic or is it sufficient that these regimes are less repressive than before? Are there moral reasons for thinking that soldiers should be relieved of responsibility so as to advance the goal of peace building? And how should we regard the often conflicting goals of telling the truth about what occurred in the past and allowing individuals to have their day in court? These questions and more are analyzed in detail. It also explores whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This collection of essays brings together some of the leading legal, political and moral theorists to discuss normative issues that arise when war concludes and when a society strives to regain peace. The volume questions whether jus post bellum itself should be a distinct field of inquiry. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.