Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Majestic Books, Hounslow, United Kingdom
Condition: New. pp. 264.
Published by Cambridge University Press 2008-09-18, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: New.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
£ 33.15
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketCondition: New. In.
Published by Cambridge University Press CUP, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
£ 30.81
Convert currencyQuantity: 1 available
Add to basketCondition: New. pp. 264.
Published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: CitiRetail, Stevenage, United Kingdom
First Edition
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.
Published by Cambridge University Press, GB, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Rarewaves.com UK, London, United Kingdom
£ 36.93
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketPaperback. Condition: New. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germany
£ 32.10
Convert currencyQuantity: 1 available
Add to basketCondition: New. pp. 264.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: California Books, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
£ 36.52
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketCondition: New.
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 1st edition. 253 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
£ 51
Convert currencyQuantity: 1 available
Add to basketTaschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law.
Published by Cambridge University Press, GB, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, United Kingdom
£ 41.87
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketPaperback. Condition: New. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.
Published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
First Edition
£ 48.60
Convert currencyQuantity: 1 available
Add to basketPaperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.
Published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, U.S.A.
First Edition
£ 39.68
Convert currencyQuantity: 1 available
Add to basketPaperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
£ 31.67
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketCondition: New.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
£ 31.75
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketPaperback / softback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 390.
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 1st edition. 253 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.
Published by Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521703956 ISBN 13: 9780521703956
Language: English
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
£ 37.34
Convert currencyQuantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketCondition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly ass.