Anke Büter (45 results)

Condition: NEW.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

paperback. Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: New. 2024. paperback. . . . . .

Paperback or Softback. Condition: New. Feminist Philosophy of Science 0.27. Book.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. 2024. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condition: New.

Condition: New.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - 'Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice'--.

Condition: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Buch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - 'Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice'--.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. Feminist scholars have identified pervasive gender discrimination in science as an institution, as well as gender bias in the very content of many scientific theories. An ameliorative project at heart, feminist philosophy of science has inquired into the social and epistemological roots and consequences of these problems and into their potential solutions. Most feminist philosophers agree on a need for diversity in scientific communities to counter the detrimental effects of gender bias. Diversity could thus serve as a unifying concept for a potential consensus of the field. Yet there are substantial differences in the kinds and roles of diversity envisaged. This element argues that we need diversity, both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such, however, is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity also needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. This Element argues that diversity is needed both in terms of social locations and of values, to overcome former biases and blind spots. Diversity as such is insufficient. To reap its epistemic benefits, diversity needs to be institutionalised in a way that counters various forms of epistemic injustice. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback / softback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 135.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 84 pages. 6.00x0.17x9.00 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Condition: Hervorragend. Zustand: Hervorragend | Sprache: Deutsch | Produktart: Bücher.