Comparing the Efficacy of Triclosan versus Chlorhexidine Coated Suture. This item is unavailable.
Language: English
Published by LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2024
- Softcover
- New

Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.PBShop.store US
5-star seller
AbeBooks seller since April 7, 2005
Unavailable
Softcover
Condition: New
£ 40.68
Item description from seller
New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
Seller Inventory # L2-9786208171759
- Title
- Comparing the Efficacy of Triclosan versus Chlorhexidine Coated Suture
- Author
- Versha, Ritu; DEV, SACHIN
- Publisher
- LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
- Publication year
- 2024
- Condition
- New
- Binding
- PAP
- Language
- English
- ISBN 10
- 620817175X
- ISBN 13
- 9786208171759
- Item weight
- 127 grams
Among antimicrobials, triclosan and chlorohexidine have a broad antibacterial spectrum as well as high biocompatibility indices. Triclosan, an antibacterial coated polyglactin 910(vicryl plus) and chlorohexidine ,an antibacterial coated polyglactin 910(3-0) (PECTRYL CS, Dolphin suture) which replace the conventional method of administering antibiotic in routine third molar surgeries and help in maximizing antimicrobial benefits locally and reducing antibiotic load systematically and the complications that follow. Apart from promising study result of triclosan- coated sutures, triclosan also has drawbacks including formation of toxic side products(e.g. chlorinated phenols, methyl triclosan) and antibiotic resistances, likely due to its prevalence in cosmetics and soap. Additionally , triclosan promotes the protein mediated binding of staphylococci to host cells with the consequence of an increased number of nasal infections caused by S. aureus colonization in the presence of triclosan. Due to these restrictions in the use of triclosan, alternatives are urgently needed. Chlorohexidine are highly effective alternatives, inhibiting relevant pathogens of wound infections.
"Synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.