This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Frederic S. Lee is a Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He has published extensively on heterodox microeconomics, on the history of heterodox economics. He was the editor of the Heterodox Economics Newsletter and the executive director of ICAPE. He is currently the editor of the American Journal of Economics and Sociology. He has published in numerous heterodox journals including the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Review of Radical Political Economics, Review of Social Economy, and the Journal of Economic Issues.
This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research. In a contested discipline such as economics those methods are used by mainstream economists to attack and dismiss heterodox economics. In the book, discriminatory use of these methods vis-a-vis heterodox economics is investigated (with case studies in Australia, Italy, and the United States) and discussed. In addition, it is also shown how such methods can be used to promote heterodox economics and heterodox research (without at the same time denigrating mainstream economics and its research). Finally, the book concludes with the unexpected position that a contested economics discipline is a good thing for it makes for better economists who are more capable of contributing in an open and intelligent manner to economic-social policy issues.
This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research. In a contested discipline such as economics those methods are used by mainstream economists to attack and dismiss heterodox economics. In the book, discriminatory use of these methods vis-a-vis heterodox economics is investigated (with case studies in Australia, Italy, and the United States) and discussed. In addition, it is also shown how such methods can be used to promote heterodox economics and heterodox research (without at the same time denigrating mainstream economics and its research). Finally, the book concludes with the unexpected position that a contested economics discipline is a good thing for it makes for better economists who are more capable of contributing in an open and intelligent manner to economic-social policy issues.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 11627903
Seller: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Ireland
Condition: New. This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research. Num Pages: 200 pages, illustrations. BIC Classification: KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 229 x 157 x 11. Weight in Grams: 400. . 2011. 1st Edition. Paperback. . . . . Seller Inventory # V9781444339468
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 11627903-n
Seller: INDOO, Avenel, NJ, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 9781444339468
Seller: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, United Kingdom
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 11627903
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research. Num Pages: 200 pages, illustrations. BIC Classification: KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 229 x 157 x 11. Weight in Grams: 400. . 2011. 1st Edition. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Seller Inventory # V9781444339468
Seller: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, United Kingdom
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 11627903-n
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Ubiquity Trade, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Brand new! Please provide a physical shipping address. Seller Inventory # 9781444339468
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Condition: New. This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research.Über den Autor. Seller Inventory # 595861821
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Berliner Büchertisch eG, Berlin, Germany
Softcover. Condition: Gut. Auflage: Illustrated. 314 Seiten Gutes Exemplar, geringe Gebrauchsspuren, Cover/SU berieben/bestoßen, innen alles in Ordnung; Good copy, light signs of previous use, cover/dust jacket shows some rubbing/wear, interior in good condition A221014aB16 ISBN: 9781444339468 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 400. Seller Inventory # 635888