Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905. COPY OF HENRY GUERLAC.

HOWSON, Colin (ed.)

ISBN 10: 0521211107 / ISBN 13: 9780521211109

Published by Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

About this Item

vii, 344 pp; illus. Original cloth. Pencilling in text, else Very Good, in dust jacket. This copy does NOT have any library markings. First Edition. COPY OF HENRY GUERLAC (with his signature).

Seller Inventory # 6621

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905. COPY OF HENRY GUERLAC.
• Publisher: Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
• ISBN 10: 0521211107
• ISBN 13: 9780521211109
• Binding: Hardcover
• Edition: 1st Edition
• Condition: Very Good
• Dust Jacket Condition: Dust Jacket Included

About this title

Synopsis

First published in 1976, this is a volume of studies on the problems of theory-appraisal in the physical sciences - how and why important theories are developed, changed and are replaced, and by what criteria we judge one theory an advance on another. The volume is introduced by a classic paper of Imre Lakatos's, which sets out a theory for tackling these problems - the methodology of scientific research programmes. Five contributors then test this theory against particular and celebrated case-studies in the history of the physical sciences (particularly in the nineteenth century). The volume ends with a characteristically forceful and original critique of the whole enterprise by Paul Feyerabend. the book is a companion volume to Method and Appraisal in Economics. Both are natural sequels to Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge and attempt to work out in particular cases the implications of some of the theories presented in that book.

Book Description

First published in 1976, this is a volume of studies on the problems of theory-appraisal in the physical sciences - how and why important theories are developed, changed and are replaced, and by what criteria we judge one theory an advance on another.