From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory Part 1 and Part 2 - 2 Bände

Kamp, Hans und Uwe Reyle:

ISBN 10: 079232403X / ISBN 13: 9780792324034

Published by Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1993

About this Item

VIII, 711 Seiten ; Mit Figuren Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 42 - Innen sauberer, guter Zustand. Hardcover, Pappeinband, mit den üblichen Bibliotheks-Markierungen, Stempeln und Einträgen, innen wie außen, siehe Bilder. (Evtl. auch Kleber- und/oder Etikettenreste, sowie -abdrücke durch abgelöste Bibliotheksschilder). Einbände sehr gut erhalten. In Englisch RW-00-02B|S57 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 1390.

Seller Inventory # 2027160

Bibliographic Details

• Title: From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory Part 1 and Part 2 - 2 Bände
• Publisher: Dordrecht : Kluwer
• Publication Date: 1993
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 079232403X
• ISBN 13: 9780792324034
• Binding: 23 x 15,5 cm
• Edition: Volume 42.
• Condition: Gut
• Seller catalogs:
  • Modernes Antiquariat

About this title

Synopsis

Preface This book is about semantics and logic. More specifically, it is about the semantics and logic of natural language; and, even more specifically than that, it is about a particular way of dealing with those subjects, known as Discourse Representation Theory, or DRT. DRT is an approach towards natural language semantics which, some thirteen years ago, arose out of attempts to deal with two distinct problems. The first of those was the semantic puzzle that had been brought to contempo­ rary attention by Geach's notorious "donkey sentences" - sentences like If Pedro owns some donkey, he beats it, in which the anaphoric connection we perceive between the indefinite noun phrase some donkey and the pronoun it may seem to conflict with the existential meaning of the word some. The second problem had to do with tense and aspect. Some languages, for instance French and the other Romance languages, have two morphologically distinct past tenses, a simple past (the French Passe Simple) and a continuous past (the French Imparfait). To articulate precisely what the difference between these tenses is has turned out to be surprisingly difficult.