Bound and Gagged

Travis, Alan

ISBN 10: 1861972296 / ISBN 13: 9781861972293

Published by Profile Books, 2000

About this Item

Near fine condition.Profile Books,2000.First UK edition-first printing.Blue hardback(gilt lettering to the spine,small dent/nick on the edge of the back cover) with Dj(some nicks and crease on the edges of the Dj cover,small colour mark on the edge of the back Dj cover),both in near fine condition.Illustrated with b/w photos,drawings.Nice and clean pages as new with two small ink marks and light shelf wear on the outer edges,small nick on the edge of the pages.Nice and clean book with light shelf wear on the Dj cover.347pp including List of illustrations,a note on sources,notes,index.A collectable first edition. This is another paragraph Review: This book summarizes a number of censorship controversies in England during the 20th century. Many have previously been documented at length, but have been unavailable for some time, for example the OZ trials, the Lady Chatterley case, Mrs Whitehouse's attempted prosecution of the National Theatre, and it is useful to have some of the details on hand, if only to remind ourselves how ludicrous the British have been in their treatment of serious artists who have tried to deal openly with sexual matters. The book, though not overtly, is clearly on the side of the writer, painter, playwright rather than of the Home Office, and it must surely be clear to most people, reading of the farcical activities of past Home Secretaries and private prosecutors, just how impossible (not to say inadvisable) it is to censor the human imagination. Seller Inventory # 372

Bibliographic Details

Title: Bound and Gagged

Publisher: Profile Books

Publication Date: 2000

Binding: Hardcover

Condition: Near fine

Dust Jacket Condition: Near fine

Edition: First UK edition-first printing.

About this title

Synopsis:

In a revealing study of the way class-driven decisions are made, Alan Travis examines censorship, from the time of Queen Victoria and the "Obscene Publications Act", through to the 21st century and the impact of the Internet and the Web on free expression.

Review:

With the tangle of the Web, the notion of censorship is as relevant and challenging as it's ever been. The Guardian's Alan Travis wraps discussion of free speech and child protection on the Net, the role of the Internet Watch Foundation, and a call for a comprehensive revision of the Obscene Publications Act, around an agile account of the history of its application. And it comes, naturally, in a brown paper cover. Opening with Ulysses, banned after the DPP read just 42 of the 732 pages, with establishment outcry drowning out Molly Bloom's orgasmic ones, it proceeds via a now-classic progression of test cases--The Well of Loneliness, Fanny Hill, and virtually anything by DH Lawrence, but infamously Lady Chatterley's Lover. A series of hapless double-barrelled Home Secretaries did their best to wreak havoc on literature they had not read, with perhaps the worst, Sir William Joynson-Hicks, a dour anti-Communist who also presided over ominously worthy organisations such as the Public Morality Council, using as a yardstick whether a work would bring a blush to the cheek of Little Nell. Today L'il Kim might be more appropriate, but the nanny state ruled in the nursery of public morality.

It was to grow up. The battles of the reforming Roy Jenkins against police corruption (the Met Commissioner laid down, as a smudged thumbnail, that if the ink came off in your hands, it was porn), the Lady Chatterley case, the needless severity of the sentences in the "Oz" trial, and the abolition of theatre censorship in 1968, all helped define abstract concepts such as obscenity and harm, while sending vulgarity back to the Blackpool postcards it had always graced. Fascinating when viewed alongside Michael Hames' The Dirty Squad, which shows the recent shift of police focus to child pornography, Alan Travis' fluid, wry journalism, the story of the growing pains of Britain as a sexual nation, successfully highlights when the law is an ass, while underlining the fundamental role it still has to play, alongside responsible self-regulation, in a global community lacking moral equilibrium. --David Vincent