Order Total (1 Item Items):
Shipping Destination:
Zhang Chuan Xin Jia Jian (1 results)
Feedback
Skip to main search results
Search filters
Product Type
- All Product Types
- Books (1)
- Magazines & Periodicals (No further results match this refinement)
- Comics (No further results match this refinement)
- Sheet Music (No further results match this refinement)
- Art, Prints & Posters (No further results match this refinement)
- Photographs (No further results match this refinement)
- Maps (No further results match this refinement)
- Manuscripts & Paper Collectibles (No further results match this refinement)
Condition
- All Conditions
- New (1)
- Used (No further results match this refinement)
Binding
- All Bindings
- Hardcover (No further results match this refinement)
- Softcover (1)
Collectible Attributes
- First Edition (No further results match this refinement)
- Signed (No further results match this refinement)
- Dust Jacket (No further results match this refinement)
- Seller-Supplied Images (No further results match this refinement)
- Not Print on Demand (1)
Language (1)
Price
- Any Price
- Under £ 20 (No further results match this refinement)
- £ 20 to £ 35 (No further results match this refinement)
- Over £ 35
Free Shipping
- Free Shipping to United Kingdom (No further results match this refinement)
Seller Location
Seller Rating
-
Research on Pluralistic Legal Logic and Thinking(Chinese Edition)
Published by Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2023
ISBN 10: 7513089353 ISBN 13: 9787513089357
Language: English
£ 101.09
Convert currency£ 11.17 shipping from China to United KingdomQuantity: 3 available
Add to basketpaperback. Condition: New. Paperback.Pub Date:2023-09 Pages:244 Language:Chinese Publisher:Intellectual Property Publishing House There are many different opinions on the value and role of logic in law in modern and contemporary legal studies. There is conceptual jurisprudence that regards judicial syllogism as the cornerstone of the legal system; there are liberal jurisprudence. realist jurisprudence and postmodern jurisprudence that strongly deny the role of logic in law. In terms of constructing relevant legal logic.
