Lawrence Jost (38 results)

Hardcover. Condition: Good. Pages slightly tanned. Top corner of rear cover slightly worn otherwise Good. NOT A FORMER LIBRARY BOOK.

Hardcover. Condition: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condition: Very Good Plus. Stapled wraps with light wear only, well bound, clean, unmarked. 62 pages.

Paperback. first edition. very good - fine trade paperback.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Good. 398 page hardcover illustrated with photographs. The story of the 1969 student occupation of Harvard's University Hall. The authors were reporters for the student radio station WHRB. Dust jacket has light wear. Book is unmarked, tight and clean.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. 1st Edition. First edition/first printing. Black cloth-covered boards with red lettering and decoration (raised fist), 8 5/8 x 5 7/8 inches, 381 pp., index, b/w photo illustrations, map-illustrated endpapers. Book very good minus (modest spotting to front board; mild spine slant; pages clean and binding tight). Dustcover very good (moderate rubbing and edgewear). "It couldn't happen here, almost everyone said about the oldest and most renowned university in the country. Then on April 9, 1969, a band of students led by the radical wing of SDS seized University Hall." (1722RO081).

Hardcover. Condition: Near Fine. Dust Jacket Condition: NoNE. PHOTOS (illustrator). STATED FIRST PRINTNG. A RARE TITLE DOCUMENTING UNREST AT HARVARD IN 1969 STATED FIRST PRINTING SOLID CLEAN AND BRIGHT BOUND IN BLACK WITH BRIGHT RED LETTERING AND DESIGN SMALL PREVIOUS OWNERS SIGNATURE.

paperback. Condition: Good. Paperback. Staining to fore-edge of text-block. A few pages have creased corners. Otherwise, clean and solid. Ships from a smoke-free home.

Hardcover. Condition: Near Fine. 1st Edition. *Veteran-Owned, Family-Run, Small Book Store in the Pacific Northwest* FAST SHIPPING!! / Clean text, no markings, tight binding.

Hardcover. Condition: Used.

Condition: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. Dust jacket in good condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,750grams, ISBN:9780521515252.

Paperback. Condition: New. In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. Binding is tight, sturdy, and square; boards also very good. Shelfwear is very minor. Previous owner's inscription on front endpaper, otherwise text very good. No dust jacket if issued. NOT an ex-library copy, NO remainder mark. Ships from Dinkytown in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Condition: New. In.

Paperback. Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. reprint edition. 324 pages. 9.02x5.99x0.73 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condition: New. In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields.

Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields. This volume presents the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists in twelve newly commissioned essays by leading scholars in both of these traditions. The authors identify the common ground, and also the real and lasting differences, between the two approaches. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condition: Good. Academic Printing & Publishing, 2002. Cover lightly rubbed/bumped, very lightly soiled, corners/spine ends very lightly rubbed/bumped; edges very lightly soiled; faint erasures on half- Title page; binding tight; cover, edges, and interior intact and clean except as noted. paperback. Good.

Buch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields.

Hardcover. Condition: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Hardcover. Condition: Very good. Dust Jacket Condition: Good. Daniel Alexander (Authors photograph) (illustrator). First Printing [Stated]. xvi, [2], 381, [1] pages. Illustrated endpapers. Footnotes. Illustrations. Appendix. Index. The DJ is in a plastic sleeve and has some wear and soiling. The surprise take over of a university building by the SDS brought to light the conflicts and differences between students, between students and faculty and the administration and the demands of the black students. On April 9, 1969, a band of students led by the SDS seized University Hall. The authors probe the inflamed and contradictory reports. They identify forces set in motion many months before the event, and follow the gradual hardening of attitudes on issues that divided students, faculty, and administration. The account of the seventeen-hour period during which students occupied University Hall produces striking vignettes--the orderly procedures of the insurgents for providing food and supplies, and the president of the university watching the police action through field glasses. The story follows the forging of new policies by each faction under the pressures of passionate concern, tight deadlines, and the glare of publicity. As part of the wider anti-war movement of the 1960s, student organizations such as the Harvard chapter of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) ran anti-war activities on campus. The Harvard Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) programs drew particular attention. Although the faculty was willing to reduce the programs' privileges, the Harvard Corporation refused to terminate it. These developments, alongside the creation of a degree program in Afro-American studies, led to the events of April 1969. On the night of April 8 to 9, a group of about 300 students, led by the SDS, tacked a list of demands on the door of the home of Nathan Pusey, then President of Harvard. Not only did it call for the abolition of ROTC, but also for lower rent and student involvement in designing the curriculum for the Afro-American studies degree. The demands were later rejected by Pusey as baseless. At noon on April 9, a group of 30 to 70 students entered University Hall, ejecting administrative staff and faculty. While most left the building peacefully, some faculty like assistant dean Archie Epps were forcefully expelled. At 4:15 p.m. Harvard Yard was closed off by the administration, citing safety concerns. The occupiers were threatened with criminal prosecution and disciplinary action if they did not leave by 4:30. The Boston Globe estimated the number of students inside University Hall to now be about 500, with at least 3000 onlookers in the Yard. At 5 p.m., a meeting between moderate students and Dean Fred Glimp was convened at Lowell Lecture Hall, both agreeing on a peaceful resolution of the conflict. In the aftermath of the occupation, a series of reforms began. The ROTC lost the privileges not held by other extracurricular activities by a vote of the faculty later endorsed by the Harvard Corporation. Student representatives got a role in the appointment of faculty for Afro-American studies. A special "Committee of Fifteen" was formed to deal with the participants of the occupation. Unusual for a faculty board, it was not appointed, but elected by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, consisting of ten of its members and augmented by five students, three from the College and one each of Radcliffe College and the Graduate School.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields. This volume presents the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists in twelve newly commissioned essays by leading scholars in both of these traditions. The authors identify the common ground, and also the real and lasting differences, between the two approaches. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. reprint edition. 324 pages. 9.02x5.99x0.73 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback / softback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. In western philosophy today, the three leading approaches to normative ethics are those of Kantian ethics, virtue ethics and utilitarianism. In recent years the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists has assumed an especially prominent position. The twelve newly commissioned essays in this volume, by leading scholars in both traditions, explore key aspects of each approach as related to the debate, and identify new common ground but also real and lasting differences between these approaches. The volume provides a rich overview of the continuing debate between two powerful forms of enquiry, and will be valuable for a wide range of students and scholars working in these fields. This volume presents the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists in twelve newly commissioned essays by leading scholars in both of these traditions. The authors identify the common ground, and also the real and lasting differences, between the two approaches. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This volume presents the debate between Kantian ethicists and virtue ethicists in twelve newly commissioned essays by leading scholars in both of these traditions. The authors identify the common ground, and also the real and lasting differences, between th.