University of Iowa Studies. This item is unavailable.University of Iowa Studies

"University of Iowa Studies" (Volume 2) represents a significant milestone in the early twentieth-century academic exploration of human character and psychological states. This volume features rigorous empirical research, most notably the comparative work of Robert Daniel Sinclair regarding the subjective experience of the divine. The text examines the psychological differences and similarities between individuals who report a conscious sense of divine presence and those who do not, utilizing the scientific methods of the era to probe the depths of religious consciousness.

As a scholarly contribution to the psychology of religion, this work moves beyond abstract theology to focus on measurable data and human testimony. It explores how personal conviction and spiritual perception intersect with personality and social behavior. This volume is an invaluable resource for historians of social science, researchers in the field of psychology, and anyone interested in the academic study of mysticism and belief. By documenting the nuances of religious experience through a psychological lens, Sinclair provides a detailed snapshot of how the human mind grapples with the concept of the transcendent.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.