Steady State Capital Theory

C. C. V. Weizsacker

ISBN 10: 3540055827 / ISBN 13: 9783540055822

Published by Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K, 1971

About this Item

Ancien livre de bibliothèque. Traces d'usure sur la couverture. Edition 1971. Tome 54. Ammareal reverse jusqu'à 15% du prix net de cet article à des organisations caritatives. ENGLISH DESCRIPTION Book Condition: Used, Good. Former library book. Signs of wear on the cover. Edition 1971. Volume 54. Ammareal gives back up to 15% of this item's net price to charity organizations. Seller Inventory # E-623-985

Bibliographic Details

Title: Steady State Capital Theory

Publisher: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K

Publication Date: 1971

Binding: Softcover

Condition: Bon

About this title

Synopsis:

The following lecture notes were written shortly after I gave a course on capital theory in the winter-semester 1970/71 at the Univer­ sity of Heidelberg. While the general line of the argument is similar to the one in the course, I have modified and added a large number' of specific points in the process of writing the English version. I should like to emphasize the narrow limitations of the material covered in these notes. I have completely concentrated on steady states of stationary and exponentially growing economies, even up to the point where there is the danger of misleading the reader1 I have done this for several reasons. Other activities have not left me with a sufficient amount of time to be able to find the unifying principle of analysis and mode of presentation for the dynamic aspects of capi­ tal theory which would have made it worthwhile to add a sizeable book to the large body of literature in this field. On the other hand over the last couple of years I have become increasingly aware that some of the results in steady state capital theory (which could be derived without too much mathematical effort) are of relevance in present day dis­ cussions about the political role of economic theory and the relative merits of orthodox and radical economics. Also these results seemed not to be known by' mO$ of the participants in these discussions.