Speech Acts and the First Amendment

Professor Emeritus Franklyn S Haiman

ISBN 10: 0809318822 / ISBN 13: 9780809318827

Published by Southern Illinois University Press, 1993

Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less. Seller Inventory # G0809318822I3N00

Synopsis:

What can a democratic society reasonably do about the perplexing problems of racial intolerance, sexual harassment, incitements to violence, and invasions of privacy? Is it possible to preserve the constitutional ideal of free expression while protecting the community from those who would trample on the rights of others?

Franklyn S. Haiman critically examines the reasoning behind recent efforts to prohibit certain forms of speech and explores the possible consequences to democracy of such moves.

Speech act theory, well known to scholars of rhetoric, communication, and language, underlies this emerging trend in judicial and legislative thinking. The idea that "words are deeds," first articulated in language philosophy by Wittgenstein and elaborated by J. L. Austin and John Searle, is being invoked by some members of the legal community to target objectionable speech. For example, speech codes on some college campuses prohibit racist, sexist, and homophobic expression, and attempts have been made through local laws to classify pornography as a form of sex discrimination. By defining certain kinds of arguably immoral symbolic behavior such as hate speech, obscenity, or portrayals of violence as acts rather than as pure speech, speech act advocates make it easier to argue that such conduct should be subject to social control through the law.

Unlike totalitarian or theocratic societies that see no difference between their concept of morality and the law, however, a democracy must make a distinction between what it regards as immoral and what it makes illegal. Haiman maintains that in the realm of symbolic behavior the line between them should be drawn as closely as possible to expression that results in the most serious, direct, immediate, and physical harm to others. Thus, he joins with former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in concluding that, absent an emergency, more speech, not enforced silence, should be the aim of a free society.

About the Author:

Franklyn S. Haiman is John Evans Professor Emeritus of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. He received the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award and the Speech Communication Association’s award for the most outstanding scholarly book of the year in 1981 for Speech and Law in a Free Society.

Bibliographic Details

Title: Speech Acts and the First Amendment
Publisher: Southern Illinois University Press
Publication Date: 1993
Binding: Hardcover
Condition: Good
Dust Jacket Condition: No Jacket