Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle (No 14) (Synthese Historical Library)

Dancy, R. M.

ISBN 10: 9027705658 / ISBN 13: 9789027705655

Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1975

About this Item

This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. No dust jacket. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,500grams, ISBN:9027705658.

Seller Inventory # 8766391

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle (No 14) (Synthese Historical Library)
• Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers
• Publication Date: 1975
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 9027705658
• ISBN 13: 9789027705655
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: Good
• Weight: 500 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Philosophy

About this title

Synopsis

This study began as a paper. It got out of hand. It had help doing that. Oswaldo Chateaubriand, Ronald Haver, Paul Horwich, Bernie Katz, Norman Kretzmann, Stanley Martens, Stephen Pink, Michael Stokes, Eleanor Stump, Bill Ulrich, Celia Wolf, and a lot of other people questioned or criticized or helped reformulate one or another of the arguments and interpretations along the way. In spite of (maybe partly because of) their efforts, the book is full of mistakes. At least, induction over previous drafts indicates that irresistibly. But I do not, right now, know of any particular mistakes. All but a couple of the translations are mine (the exceptions are noted). That is not because existing translations are bad, but because some uniformity was essential. The translations often make unpleasant reading. So, often, does Aristotle; I have tried to be literal. A text and translation of the passage on which the book centers is in Appendix III. Footnotes cite literature by author and (sometimes abbreviated) title. Details are in the bibliography. I do not profess to have covered all the literature. An enormous amount of editorial work was done by Margaret Mundy. She was not able to undo the errors that remain. In particular, the footnotes are often numbered oddly: '4', '4a', '4b', etc.