In the long shadows cast by the Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas nominations, Supreme Court confirmations remain highly contentious and controversial. This is due in part to the Senate's increasing reliance upon a much lengthier, much more public, and occasionally raucous confirmation process - in an effort to curb the potential excesses of executive power created by presidents seeking greater control over the Court's ideological composition. Michael Comiskey offers the most comprehensive, systematic, and optimistic analysis of that process to date. Arguing that the process works well and therefore should not be significantly altered, Comiskey convincingly counters those critics who view highly contentious confirmation proceedings as the norm. Senators have every right and a real obligation, he contends, to scrutinize the nominees' constitutional philosophies. He further argues that the media coverage of the Senate's deliberations has worked to improve the level of such scrutiny and that recent presidents have neither exerted excessive influence on the appointment process nor created a politically extreme Court. He also examines the ongoing concern over presidential efforts to pack the court, concluding that stacking the ideological deck is unlikely. As an exception to the rule, Comiskey analyzes in depth the Thomas confirmation to explain why it was an aberration, offering the most detailed account yet of Thomas's pre-judicial professional and political activities. He argues that the Senate Judiciary Committee abdicated its responsibilities out of deference to Thomas's race. Another of the book's unique features is Comiskey's reassessment of the reputations of twentieth-century Supreme Court justices. Based on a survey of nearly 300 scholars in constitutional law and politics, it shows that the modern confirmation process continues to fill Court vacancies with jurists as capable as those of earlier eras. We have now seen the longest period without a turnover on the Court since the early nineteenth century, making inevitable the appointment of several new justices following the 2004 presidential election. Thus, the timing of the publication of Seeking Justices could not be more propitious.

"Synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.

Review

"A lively and well-informed discussion of the confirmation process, particularly as it relates to the latter half of the twentieth century. . . . This book will do much to enrich our understanding of the confirmation process, and it will enliven debate for years to come about what criteria the Senate should emphasize when selecting justices of the Supreme Court."--H-Net Reviews

"The topic could hardly be timelier. . . . Despite the rancor surrounding recent judicial appointments, Comiskey defends the modern confirmation process. Not only have critics exaggerated its contentiousness, but also he argues that the process works well, producing capable jurists and a needed arena for discussing important constitutional and legal issues. . . . Comiskey has provided a thorough and systematic account of the modern confirmation process and the debates surrounding it. His analysis is thoughtful and provocative. He successfully rebuts many of the criticisms of the modern process. He also argues persuasively that it has led to a more robust constitutional dialogue and the appointment of able justices, while avoiding the appointment of extremists."--The Historian

"A very good critique of the arguments forwarded by the legal and political schools about a possible broken confirmation process. . . . I commend Seeking Justices to anyone interested in learning about the ins and outs of the confirmation process."--Perspectives on Politics

"While no one will agree with all of Comiskey's conclusions, there is no doubt that his book will inform the debate on the confirmation of Supreme Court nominations for years to come."--Political Science Quarterly

"A deeply informative discussion of the modern confirmation process. It is also easily accessible to undergraduate students, and should work well in a course on the judiciary."--Law and Politics Book Review

"A thoughtful perspective on how the process has worked in recent years . . . useful for courses on the presidency."--Choice

"A substantial contribution."--Perspectives on Political Science

"Comiskey adds to the extant scholarly literature on the subject by organizing and then deconstructing the arguments so that attentive publics may more fully appreciate the full contours of the debate. This book is a solid contribution to our collective knowledge."--Judicature

"A timely and important analysis that will interest all concerned with how and why the confirmation process has been transformed by federal judgeships becoming symbols and instruments of presidential power and by the increasing polarization of American politics."--David M. O'Brien, author of Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics

"The most thoroughgoing analysis of the confirmation process in the post-Bork era. A stunning exposition of and refreshing counterpoint to 'legalist' and 'political' arguments."--Tinsley Yarbrough, author of The Rehnquist Court and the Constitution

"An important book on a vitally important subject."--Sheldon Goldman, author of Picking Federal Judges

"About the title" may belong to another edition of this title.

INDOO

Avenel, NJ, U.S.A.

5-star seller

AbeBooks seller since August 9, 2004

Shipping rates within U.S.A.

Item	5 to 14 business days	5 to 14 business days
First item	£ 0.00	£ 0.00

Delivery times are set by sellers and vary by carrier and location. Orders passing through Customs may face delays and buyers are responsible for any associated duties or fees. Sellers may contact you regarding additional charges to cover any increased costs to ship your items.

Payment methods

Seller's business information

Websew.com Inc

22C Cragwood Road
Avenel, NJ U.S.A. 07001

Contact sellerView this seller's itemsView seller's storefront

Terms of sale

We sell brand new books from the publisher.

Right of withdrawal

If you are a consumer you can withdraw from the contract in accordance with the following. Consumer means any natural person who is acting for purposes which are outside his trade, business, craft or profession.

Information regarding the right of withdrawal

Statutory right to withdraw

You have the right to withdraw from this contract within 14 days without giving any reason.

The withdrawal period will expire after 14 days from the day on which you acquire, or a third party other than the carrier and indicated by you acquires, physical possession of the last good or the last lot or piece.

To exercise the right of withdrawal, electronically fill in and submit a clear statement on our website, under "My Purchases" in "My Account". We will communicate to you an acknowledgement of receipt of such a withdrawal on a durable medium (e.g. by e-mail) without delay.

To meet the withdrawal deadline, it is sufficient for you to send your communication concerning your exercise of the right of withdrawal before the withdrawal period has expired.

Effects of withdrawal

If you withdraw from this contract, we will reimburse to you all payments received from you, including the costs of delivery (except for the supplementary costs arising if you chose a type of delivery other than the least expensive type of standard delivery offered by us).

We may make a deduction from the reimbursement for loss in value of any goods supplied, if the loss is the result of unnecessary handling by you.

We will make the reimbursement without undue delay, and not later than 14 days after the day on which we are informed about your decision to withdraw from this contract.

We will make the reimbursement using the same means of payment as you used for the initial transaction, unless you have expressly agreed otherwise; in any event, you will not incur any fees as a result of such reimbursement.

We may withhold reimbursement until we have received the goods back, or you have supplied evidence of having sent back the goods, whichever is the earliest.

You shall send back the goods or hand them over to INDOO, Avenel, New Jersey, U.S.A., without undue delay and in any event not later than 14 days from the day on which you communicate your withdrawal from this contract to us. The deadline is met if you send back the goods before the period of 14 days has expired. You will have to bear the direct cost of returning the goods. You are only liable for any diminished value of the goods resulting from the handling other than what is necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and functioning of the goods.

Exceptions to the right of withdrawal

The right of withdrawal does not apply to:

The delivery of newspapers, journals or magazines with the exception of subscription contracts; and
The supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium (e.g. on a CD or DVD) if you accepted when you placed your order that we could start to deliver it, and that you could not withdraw once delivery had started.

Shipping terms

Shipping costs are based on books weighing 2.2 LB, or 1 KG. If your book order is heavy or oversized, we may contact you to let you know extra shipping is required.

SEEKING JUSTICES

Item description from seller

Bibliographic details

Synopsis

About the title