Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning : International Workshop, Ppswr 2003, Mumbai, India, December 8, 2003 : Proceedings

Bry, Francois; Henze, Nicola; Maluszynski, Jan; Ppswr (2003 Bombay, India); Mauszynski, J.

ISBN 10: 3540205829 / ISBN 13: 9783540205821

Published by Springer, 2003

About this Item

Seller Inventory # 5906775-n

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning : International Workshop, Ppswr 2003, Mumbai, India, December 8, 2003 : Proceedings
• Publisher: Springer
• Publication Date: 2003
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 3540205829
• ISBN 13: 9783540205821
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

The Semantic Web is a major endeavor aimed at enriching the existing Web withmetadataandprocessingmethodssoastoprovideWeb-basedsystemswith advanced(so-calledintelligent)capabilities,inparticularwithcontext-awareness and decision support. The advanced capabilities striven for in most Semantic Web application s- narios primarily call for reasoning. Reasoning capabilities are o?ered by exi- ing Semantic Web languages, such as BPEL4WS, BPML, ConsVISor, DAML-S, JTP, TRIPLE, and others. These languages, however, were developed mostly from functionality-centered (e.g., ontology reasoning or access validation) or application-centered (e.g., Web service retrieval and composition) perspectives. A perspective centered on the reasoning techniques (e.g., forward or backward chaining, tableau-like methods, constraint reasoning, etc.) complementing the above-mentioned activities appears desirable for Semantic Web systems and - plications. The workshop on "Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reas- ing," which took place on December 8, 2003, in Mumbai, India, was the ?rst of a series of scienti?c meetings devoted to such a perspective. JustasthecurrentWebisinherentlyheterogeneousindataformatsanddata semantics, the Semantic Web will be inherently heterogeneous in its reasoning forms.Indeed,anysingleformof reasoningturnsouttobeirrealin theSemantic Web. For example, ontology reasoning in general relies on monotonic negation (for the metadata often can be fully speci?ed), while databases, Web databases, and Web-based information systems call for non-monotonic reasoning (for one would not specify non-existing trains in a railway timetable); constraint reas- ing is needed when dealing with time (for time intervals have to be dealt with), while(forwardand/orbackward)chainingisthereasoningofchoicewhencoping with database-like views (for views, i.e., virtual data, can be derived from actual data using operations such as join and projections).