Synopsis
Excerpt from The Contingency of the Laws of Nature
For a certain period of time, man is content with this conception. And, indeed, is it not even at so early a stage a very fertile one? All the same, whilst observing facts, the mind notes that there is a con stant relation between them. It sees that nature consists not of isolated objects but rather of inter related phenomena. It notes that the contiguity of the phenomena, from the point of view of the senses, is no certain indication of their actual correlation. It would like to set out phenomena, not in the order in which they appear to it, but in that in which they really depend on one another. Henceforth, it regards purely descriptive science as inadequate, and even inexact, in that it perverts the relations of things. The mind would add explanatory knowledge thereto, but this the senses are unable to procure; for, to effect this, observed relations must be noted and compared together, so as to distinguish between those that are constant and those that are general. Then, once these limits or schemes have been made, the particular relations we purpose to explain must be fitted into them. Now, the senses only arrive at those relations that are immediately given by things themselves. The understanding, however, intervenes and shows the mind a higher point Of view, from which things are really perceived in their general aspect. The mind, then, sets the under standing to interpret, Classify, and explain the data of the senses.
Product Description
Excerpt from The Contingency of the Laws of Nature, Vol. 5 Mr Fred Roth well, who has made a careful translation of several of my writings, now offers the English-speaking public a translation of the work entitled: De la Contingence des Lois de la Nature. May I be permitted to say, without false modesty, that when in 1874 I presented this thesis at the Sorbonne for my doctors degree, I had no conception that it would create attention after so long an interval, all the more so as the idea I set forth at that time seemed paradoxical and very unlikely to be taken into consideration? As it happens, this idea is now attracting the attention of philosophers in various countries, and, in spite of the important development of scientific philosophy that has since come about, it is regarded by benevolent critics as a question of the day. It may, then, be interesting to state what are the two leading thoughts of this work. The first is that philosophy should not confine itself to going over and over again the philosophical concepts offered us by the systems of our predecessors with the object of defining and combining them in more or less novel fashion: a thing that happens too frequently in the case of German philosophers. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
