Art and science are commonly considered to be two distinct expressions of human culture. This volume of the Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art is devoted to the very rich but also complex relationship between the two in the early modern Netherlands, a relationship that went much further than the use of linear perspective in painting. Both in theory and in everyday practice, the distinction between art and science was hard to sustain - and often proved to be irrelevant. The contemporary Latin terms 'ars' and 'scientia' were complementary rather than opposites, covering a spectrum of meanings, such as skill, experience and knowledge. In the early modern Netherlands, artists perfected the portrayal of human anatomy, natural historians reflected on the visual representation of previously unknown life-forms, and wealthy citizens possessed cabinets of curiosities in which naturalia and artificialia shared prominence. The case studies in this rich and challenging volume explore such topics as the influence of pictography, theories of vision and colour, the influence of Cartesian natural philosophy on art theory, and the allegorisation of science in Dutch frontispieces, amongst others.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
‘Kunst’ en ‘wetenschap’ worden veelal beschouwd als geheel verschillende uitingen van de menselijke cultuur. Deze aflevering van het Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek is gewijd aan de uitzonderlijk rijke en complexe verhouding tussen beiden in de vroegmoderne Nederlanden, die veel verder ging dan het gebruik van lijnperspectief in de schilderkunst. Zowel in theorie als in de alledaagse praktijk was de grens tussen ‘kunst’ en ‘wetenschap’ nauwelijks te trekken, en deed deze er feitelijk ook weinig toe. Kunstenaars oefenden zich in de weergave van de menselijke anatomie, natuuronderzoekers dachten diepgaand na over de representatie van voorheen onbekende levensvormen, en vermogende burgers legden rariteitenverzamelingen aan, waarin naturalia en artificalia ogenschijnlijk kriskras door elkaar werden tentoongesteld.
Thema’s in Art and science in the early modern Netherlands zijn onder meer de rol van pictografie; uiteenlopende theorieën over licht en kleur; de invloed van nieuwe natuurfilosofische ideeën op de kunsttheorie, en de frontispices van wetenschappelijke boeken.
‘Art’ and ‘science’ are commonly considered to be two distinct expressions of human culture. This volume of the Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek is devoted to the extremely rich and complex relationship between these two in the early modern Netherlands, a relationship which went much further than the use of a linear perspective in painting. Both in theory and in everyday practice, the distinction between ‘art’ and ‘science’ was hard to sustain, and often proved to be not that relevant at all. Artists perfected the portrayal of human anatomy, natural historians reflected on the visual representation of previously unknown forms of life, and wealthy citizens possessed cabinets of curiosities in which naturalia and articificalia shared prominence. Case studies in Art and science in the early modern Netherlands explore the influence of pictography; theories of vision and colour; the influence of Cartesian natural philosophy on art theory, and the the allegorisation of science on Dutch frontispieces.
Kunst en wetenschap worden veelal beschouwd als geheel verschillende uitingen van de menselijke cultuur. Deze aflevering van het Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek is gewijd aan de uitzonderlijk rijke en complexe verhouding tussen beiden in de vroegmoderne Nederlanden, die veel verder ging dan het gebruik van lijnperspectief in de schilderkunst. Zowel in theorie als in de alledaagse praktijk was de grens tussen kunst en wetenschap nauwelijks te trekken, en deed deze er feitelijk ook weinig toe. Kunstenaars oefenden zich in de weergave van de menselijke anatomie, natuuronderzoekers dachten diepgaand na over de representatie van voorheen onbekende levensvormen, en vermogende burgers legden rariteitenverzamelingen aan, waarin naturalia en artificalia ogenschijnlijk kriskras door elkaar werden tentoongesteld. Themas in Art and science in the early modern Netherlands zijn onder meer de rol van pictografie; uiteenlopende theorieën over licht en kleur; de invloed van nieuwe natuurfilosofische ideeën op de kunsttheorie, en de frontispices van wetenschappelijke boeken. Art and science are commonly considered to be two distinct expressions of human culture. This volume of the Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek is devoted to the extremely rich and complex relationship between these two in the early modern Netherlands, a relationship which went much further than the use of a linear perspective in painting. Both in theory and in everyday practice, the distinction between art and science was hard to sustain, and often proved to be not that relevant at all. Artists perfected the portrayal of human anatomy, natural historians reflected on the visual representation of previously unknown forms of life, and wealthy citizens possessed cabinets of curiosities in which naturalia and articificalia shared prominence. Case studies in Art and science in the early modern Netherlands explore the influence of pictography; theories of vision and colour; the influence of Cartesian natural philosophy on art theory, and the the allegorisation of science on Dutch frontispieces.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Curious Book Shop, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: Very Good bumped. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good-. Spine ends and corners slightly; quarto; 367 pages. Seller Inventory # 27029
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. bilingual edition. 367 pages. 10.25x7.75x1.50 inches. In Stock. Seller Inventory # __9040078084
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Brook Bookstore, Milano, MI, Italy
Condition: new. Seller Inventory # 8f600203258f44cbd839fda8cd1e2c8a
Seller: O.o.l.p., Torino, TO, Italy
Seller Inventory # 6544c19d3542dda4537961d222f335be