Reconstruction of extensive orofacial defects pertaining to oncologic resection, trauma, or large cystic lesions, remains a major challenge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Microvascular free tissue transfer has emerged as the gold standard for restoring orofacial continuity, function, and facial aesthetics.Fibular free flap (FFF), Subscapular system free flaps (including lateral scapular border flaps [LSBFs] and Scapular tip free flaps [STFFs]), iliac crest free flap (ICFF), and radial forearm osseous free flap (ROFF) are amongst the contemporary choices for reconstruction. Anatomic reliability and presence of sufficient vascularized bone, project fibula as an unrivaled flap. Abundant bone stock, least donor site morbidity favour Scapula as a osseocutaneous flap. Although each has their specific merits & demerits, prognostic demarcation of application is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Oro-facial reconstruction using microvascular free fibula flaps and scapula flaps including assessment of postoperative complications, donor-site morbidity, management of complications, requirement for secondary procedures, and overall graft longevity.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Reconstruction of extensive orofacial defects pertaining to oncologic resection, trauma, or large cystic lesions, remains a major challenge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Microvascular free tissue transfer has emerged as the gold standard for restoring orofacial continuity, function, and facial aesthetics.Fibular free flap (FFF), Subscapular system free flaps (including lateral scapular border flaps [LSBFs] and Scapular tip free flaps [STFFs]), iliac crest free flap (ICFF), and radial forearm osseous free flap (ROFF) are amongst the contemporary choices for reconstruction. Anatomic reliability and presence of sufficient vascularized bone, project fibula as an unrivaled flap. Abundant bone stock, least donor site morbidity favour Scapula as a osseocutaneous flap. Although each has their specific merits & demerits, prognostic demarcation of application is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Oro-facial reconstruction using microvascular free fibula flaps and scapula flaps including assessment of postoperative complications, donor-site morbidity, management of complications, requirement for secondary procedures, and overall graft longevity. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9786209731129
Seller: California Books, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # I-9786209731129
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L2-9786209731129
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L2-9786209731129
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware 60 pp. Englisch. Seller Inventory # 9786209731129
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Reconstruction of extensive orofacial defects pertaining to oncologic resection, trauma, or large cystic lesions, remains a major challenge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Microvascular free tissue transfer has emerged as the gold standard for restoring orofacial continuity, function, and facial aesthetics.Fibular free flap (FFF), Subscapular system free flaps (including lateral scapular border flaps [LSBFs] and Scapular tip free flaps [STFFs]), iliac crest free flap (ICFF), and radial forearm osseous free flap (ROFF) are amongst the contemporary choices for reconstruction. Anatomic reliability and presence of sufficient vascularized bone, project fibula as an unrivaled flap. Abundant bone stock, least donor site morbidity favour Scapula as a osseocutaneous flap. Although each has their specific merits & demerits, prognostic demarcation of application is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Oro-facial reconstruction using microvascular free fibula flaps and scapula flaps including assessment of postoperative complications, donor-site morbidity, management of complications, requirement for secondary procedures, and overall graft longevity. Seller Inventory # 9786209731129
Seller: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 26406553766
Seller: Majestic Books, Hounslow, United Kingdom
Condition: New. Print on Demand. Seller Inventory # 407649145
Quantity: 4 available
Seller: CitiRetail, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Reconstruction of extensive orofacial defects pertaining to oncologic resection, trauma, or large cystic lesions, remains a major challenge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Microvascular free tissue transfer has emerged as the gold standard for restoring orofacial continuity, function, and facial aesthetics.Fibular free flap (FFF), Subscapular system free flaps (including lateral scapular border flaps [LSBFs] and Scapular tip free flaps [STFFs]), iliac crest free flap (ICFF), and radial forearm osseous free flap (ROFF) are amongst the contemporary choices for reconstruction. Anatomic reliability and presence of sufficient vascularized bone, project fibula as an unrivaled flap. Abundant bone stock, least donor site morbidity favour Scapula as a osseocutaneous flap. Although each has their specific merits & demerits, prognostic demarcation of application is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Oro-facial reconstruction using microvascular free fibula flaps and scapula flaps including assessment of postoperative complications, donor-site morbidity, management of complications, requirement for secondary procedures, and overall graft longevity. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9786209731129
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Reconstruction of extensive orofacial defects pertaining to oncologic resection, trauma, or large cystic lesions, remains a major challenge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Microvascular free tissue transfer has emerged as the gold standard for restoring orofacial continuity, function, and facial aesthetics.Fibular free flap (FFF), Subscapular system free flaps (including lateral scapular border flaps [LSBFs] and Scapular tip free flaps [STFFs]), iliac crest free flap (ICFF), and radial forearm osseous free flap (ROFF) are amongst the contemporary choices for reconstruction. Anatomic reliability and presence of sufficient vascularized bone, project fibula as an unrivaled flap. Abundant bone stock, least donor site morbidity favour Scapula as a osseocutaneous flap. Although each has their specific merits & demerits, prognostic demarcation of application is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Oro-facial reconstruction using microvascular free fibula flaps and scapula flaps including assessment of postoperative complications, donor-site morbidity, management of complications, requirement for secondary procedures, and overall graft longevity.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 60 pp. Englisch. Seller Inventory # 9786209731129