Items related to Fiber Post Vs Metallic Post: An Evidence-Based Evaluation...

Fiber Post Vs Metallic Post: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Post-Endodontic Restorative Systems - Softcover

Bhattacharjee, Surupa; Manan, Rishi; Dayal, Charu

 
9786209047794: Fiber Post Vs Metallic Post: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Post-Endodontic Restorative Systems

Synopsis

Metallic posts, whether cast or prefabricated, have long been employed for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth owing to their high strength and longevity; however, their elevated elastic modulus compared with dentin predisposes to unfavorable stress concentration, vertical root fractures, compromised esthetics, and difficulty of retrieval. Fiber-reinforced composite posts, composed of glass or quartz fibers in a resin matrix, exhibit an elastic modulus comparable to dentin, thereby promoting more favorable stress distribution, reducing catastrophic failures, and offering superior optical properties compatible with all-ceramic restorations. While metallic posts remain advantageous in high-load posterior situations, fiber posts are particularly indicated in anterior and esthetically demanding cases, aligning with contemporary biomimetic principles that emphasize tooth preservation and repair-friendly failure modes.

"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.