This book provides insight into modern collective judicial decision-making. Courts all over the world sit in panels of several judges, yet the processes by which these judges produce the courts' decisions differ markedly. Judges from some of the world's most notable judicial bodies, in both the civilian and the common law tradition and from supra-/international courts, share their experiences and reflect on the challenges to which their collective endeavour gives rise. They address matters such as the question of panel constitution, the operation of rapporteur systems, pre- and post-hearing conferences, the hearing procedure itself, the nature of the interaction between the judicial panel and parties' advocates, the extent to which a unitary judgment of the court or at least a single majority judgment is required or deemed desirable, and how it is ultimately arrived at through different voting mechanisms. The judicial views are supplemented by a number of academic commentaries. Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective serves as an inspiration for future court design.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Wolgang Ernst is Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of All Souls College. Birke Hacker is the Professor of Comparative Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of Brasenose College.
This book provides insight into modern collective judicial decision-making. Courts all over the world sit in panels of several judges, yet the processes by which these judges produce the courts’ decisions differ markedly. Judges from some of the world’s most notable judicial bodies, in both the civilian and the common law tradition and from supra-/international courts, share their experiences and reflect on the challenges to which their collective endeavour gives rise. They address matters such as the question of panel constitution, the operation of rapporteur systems, pre- and post-hearing conferences, the hearing procedure itself, the nature of the interaction between the judicial panel and parties’ advocates, the extent to which a unitary judgment of the court or at least a single majority judgment is required or deemed desirable, and how it is ultimately arrived at through different voting mechanisms. The judicial views are supplemented by a number of academic commentaries. Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective serves as an inspiration for future court design.
______
Sir Jack Beatson (formerly Court of Appeal of England and Wales)
Thomas von Danwitz (Court of Justice of the European Union)
Matthew Dyson (University of Oxford)
Harry T Edwards (United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit)
Wolfgang Ernst (University of Oxford)
Kevin Garnett QC (formerly Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office)
Msgr Markus Graulich (Pontifical Council for Legislative Text)
Beate Gsell (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich)
Birke Häcker (University of Oxford)
Dominique Hascher (Cour de cassation)
Sir Launcelot Henderson (Court of Appeal of England and Wales)
Richard Hyland (Rutgers Law School)
Susan Kiefel AC (High Court of Australia)
Georg Kodek (Austrian Supreme Court)
James Lee (King’s College London)
Sir Keith Lindblom (Court of Appeal of England and Wales)
Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff (formerly German Federal Constitutional Court)
Theodor Meron (International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals)
Angelika Nussberger (formerly European Court of Human Rights)
Akira Ojima (Chief Judicial Research Official, Supreme Court of Japan)
Naoki Onishi (Otsu District Court, Japan)
Christos Ravanides (Office of Legal Affairs, United Nations)
Lord Reed of Allermuir (Supreme Court of the United Kingdom)
Thomas Rüfner (University of Trier)
Johanna Schmidt-Räntsch (German Federal Court of Justice)
Thomas Stadelmann (Swiss Supreme Court)
______
WOLFGANG ERNST is Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of All Souls College.
BIRKE HÄCKER is the Professor of Comparative Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of Brasenose College.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Phatpocket Limited, Waltham Abbey, HERTS, United Kingdom
Condition: Good. Your purchase helps support Sri Lankan Children's Charity 'The Rainbow Centre'. Shows some signs of wear but in good overall condition. Our donations to The Rainbow Centre have helped provide an education and a safe haven to hundreds of children who live in appalling conditions. Seller Inventory # Z1-A-002-04094
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 31815804
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 31815804-n
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # CX-9781780686240
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Condition: New. In. Seller Inventory # ria9781780686240_new
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, United Kingdom
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 31815804-n
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, United Kingdom
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 31815804
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # CX-9781780686240
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, United Kingdom
Hardback. Condition: New. This book provides insight into modern collective judicial decision-making. Courts all over the world sit in panels of several judges, yet the processes by which these judges produce the courts' decisions differ markedly. Judges from some of the world's most notable judicial bodies, in both the civilian and the common law tradition and from supra-/international courts, share their experiences and reflect on the challenges to which their collective endeavour gives rise. They address matters such as the question of panel constitution, the operation of rapporteur systems, pre- and post-hearing conferences, the hearing procedure itself, the nature of the interaction between the judicial panel and parties' advocates, the extent to which a unitary judgment of the court or at least a single majority judgment is required or deemed desirable, and how it is ultimately arrived at through different voting mechanisms. The judicial views are supplemented by a number of academic commentaries. Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective serves as an inspiration for future court design. Seller Inventory # LU-9781780686240
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
Hardback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days. Seller Inventory # C9781780686240
Quantity: Over 20 available