A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme Court of Judicature and the Court for the Correction of Errors, in the state of New-York; ... the names of the cases, and a table of titl - Softcover

Johnson, William

 
9781130956429: A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme Court of Judicature and the Court for the Correction of Errors, in the state of New-York; ... the names of the cases, and a table of titl

This specific ISBN edition is currently not available.

Synopsis

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1815 Excerpt: ...there was no cause for breaking up the voyage; for the vessel might have returned to Madeira with little or no repairs. Ncilson v. Coluinl)ian Insurance Company, 1 Johns. Rep. 301. 236. A vessel insured was compelled, in consequence of a storm, to put in for repairs, and her cargo was taken out, and the principal part of it necessarily sold, in order to prevent its destruction; but the vessel might have been repaired for less than half her value, so as to have been competent to prosecule her voyage; it was held, that the loss of the voyage did not entitle the insured to recover for a total loss on the ship. Goold v. Shan; 1 Johns. Cas. 293. S C. affirmed in Error, 2 Johns. Cas. 442. 237. And whether, while the vessel is in safety, a breaking up_of the voyage, in consequence of injury to the cargo, will entitle the insured to a total loss on the ship 1 Quttre. Ibid. (c) Where tliere in a loss or deterioration of the sulject. 238. Where the goods saved do not amount to half the value of the oods insured, the insured may abandon. Gdrdiner v. Smilh, 1 Johns. Cas. 141. 239. A chariot was insured, to be carried on deck, among other perils, against jettison, and free from average; (he box, estimated at two thirds of the price of the whole, was thrown overbourd in a storm; the insured may abandon fora total loss, as, hy the loss of the box, the subject no longer remained in specie. Judalt v. Randal, 2 Caines' Cas. in Error, 324. 240. To justify an abandonment, in case of stranding, the good? must be deteriorated to half their value. Ludlow v. Columbian Insurance Company, I Johns. Ilep. 335. 241 The vessel, on board of which the goods insured were laden, stranded at the mouth of a harbour. Not being able to get her off immediately, the master, with the advice of per...

"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.

Other Popular Editions of the Same Title