This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1655 Excerpt: ...act after they are of sufficient age to ratifie them they are confirmed: what could this make against our duty of Infant-baptisms the case being much' different between stipulations of men, and the covenant between God & man.as hath been (hewed, & as appeared in circumcision which was with Infants eight days old. in Gen. 17. Mr. Cobbtt well observeth, that the covenant of grace is as ht-99&c well a testament,i Cor.x 1.25. Heb.9.15,e0v.Now a testament may be, and useth to be made in reference to little ones without knowledge: nor do any use to deny a chitdt right in the Testators will,---because it understood not the fame: and that many Infants with whom God made the covenant, Gen.ij. dying such, were yet saved: and that they rcstipulate in their Parents knowing acceptance of the covenant, and professed owning of it upon the Covenant terms, as wel on their childrens parts as their own.-& they, restipulatem a passive reception of theCovenant condition & bond to sifter imitation of their father Abrahams faith & obedience. Again, our question is not concerning the ratification or effect of Infant-baptism jby their act or acts, to make it good to themselves and effectuall, when they coma of age; but concerning a Church-priviledge on Infants part, which is to be admitted unto the externall seal of Gods Covenant with his Church, it being to Parents and their children; and thisdependthon Gods institution to appoint it, and his inward working to make it good: Secondly, in the confirmation of children come to age, they then professing faith, obedience repentance, newness of Use, &t. into which in their infancy they were baptized, that is, then ratified which others promised and stipulated for them, as concerning outward profession, which i...
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.