This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1844 Excerpt: ...emancipation continues, though the parent gains a settlement in another parish. Reg. V. Inhabitants Of Yeareley, M. T. 1838. Q. B. 1 P. $ D. 60. To prove an order quashed, a book was produced, purporting to The sessionsbe the original sessions-book, containing the orders and proceedings book is e«of the court, made up and recorded after each session by the clerk dencetof the peace from minutes taken by him, and which he considered A settlement by birth is neutralized if the mother has a place of settlement (Rex v. Inhabitants of St. Mary, Leicester, T. T. 1835, K. B., 5 N. & M215). A pauper hiring herself for a time, but returning home, is emancipated. (Rex v. Inhabitants of Oulton, E. T. 1834, K. B., 3 N. & M. 62). An idiot does not become emancipated by attaining the age of twenty-one; and, consequently his settlement continues to follow that of his father, gained after he had attained that age, although he was left by his father before he had attained it. (Rexv. Inhabitants of Much Coicarne, M. T. 1831, K. B., 2 B. & Ad. 861). t The register of the marriage, (Rex v. Inhabitants of Lubbenham, H. T. 1834, K. B., 3 N. & M. 37), or a register of baptism, is not per se evidence of the place of birth. (Rex v. Inhabitants of North Pelherton, E. T. 1826, K. B., 5B.&C. 508; S. C. 8 D. & R. 325). The mere fact of a child of the age of four or five years being maintained by a parish until he was thirteen, is not evidence that he was born in the parish. (Rex v. Inhabitants of Trowbridge, T. T. 1827, K. B., 7 B. & C. 252; S. C. 1 M. & Ry. 7). On a question of second marriage, the first wife may prove the first marriage. (Rex v. Inhabitants of Bathmck, T. T. 1831, K. B., 2 B. & Ad. 639). the record of the proceedings of the cou...
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.