In a generic sense, to discriminate is to differentiate. Generic discrimination is not wrongful. But many instances of a more specific form of discrimination – differentiating between people because they are members of different socially salient groups (henceforth: group discrimination) – are wrongful. This means that people subjected to group discrimination are often wronged, and this bears importantly on whether such acts are morally impermissible. The three main accounts of what makes group discrimination wrongful appeal to considerations of harm, disrespect, and social relations of inequality, respectively. While each of them can explain the wrongfulness of some paradigmatic instances of wrongful direct discrimination, they explain the wrongfulness of a set of three important non-paradigmatic forms of discrimination – indirect discrimination, implicit bias, and algorithmic discrimination – less well. Overall, the prospects of a monistic account of the wrongfulness of discrimination are bleak.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: BargainBookStores, Grand Rapids, MI, U.S.A.
Paperback or Softback. Condition: New. Wrongful Discrimination. Book. Seller Inventory # BBS-9781009596756
Seller: California Books, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # I-9781009596756
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. In a generic sense, to discriminate is to differentiate. Generic discrimination is not wrongful. But many instances of a more specific form of discrimination differentiating between people because they are members of different socially salient groups (henceforth: group discrimination) are wrongful. This means that people subjected to group discrimination are often wronged, and this bears importantly on whether such acts are morally impermissible. The three main accounts of what makes group discrimination wrongful appeal to considerations of harm, disrespect, and social relations of inequality, respectively. While each of them can explain the wrongfulness of some paradigmatic instances of wrongful direct discrimination, they explain the wrongfulness of a set of three important non-paradigmatic forms of discrimination indirect discrimination, implicit bias, and algorithmic discrimination less well. Overall, the prospects of a monistic account of the wrongfulness of discrimination are bleak. This Element critically examines leading normative accounts of group discrimination-harm, disrespect, and inequality-and their explanatory limits in non-paradigmatic cases such as indirect, implicit, and algorithmic discrimination. It argues against the viability of a unified theory of wrongfulness. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781009596756
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. In Stock. This item is printed on demand. Seller Inventory # __1009596756
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 82 pages. 6.00x0.17x9.00 inches. In Stock. Seller Inventory # x-1009596756
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Ireland
Condition: New. 2026. paperback. . . . . . Seller Inventory # V9781009596756
Seller: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. 2026. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Seller Inventory # V9781009596756
Seller: Speedyhen, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Condition: NEW. Seller Inventory # NW9781009596756
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: CitiRetail, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. In a generic sense, to discriminate is to differentiate. Generic discrimination is not wrongful. But many instances of a more specific form of discrimination differentiating between people because they are members of different socially salient groups (henceforth: group discrimination) are wrongful. This means that people subjected to group discrimination are often wronged, and this bears importantly on whether such acts are morally impermissible. The three main accounts of what makes group discrimination wrongful appeal to considerations of harm, disrespect, and social relations of inequality, respectively. While each of them can explain the wrongfulness of some paradigmatic instances of wrongful direct discrimination, they explain the wrongfulness of a set of three important non-paradigmatic forms of discrimination indirect discrimination, implicit bias, and algorithmic discrimination less well. Overall, the prospects of a monistic account of the wrongfulness of discrimination are bleak. This Element critically examines leading normative accounts of group discrimination-harm, disrespect, and inequality-and their explanatory limits in non-paradigmatic cases such as indirect, implicit, and algorithmic discrimination. It argues against the viability of a unified theory of wrongfulness. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781009596756
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. In a generic sense, to discriminate is to differentiate. Generic discrimination is not wrongful. But many instances of a more specific form of discrimination differentiating between people because they are members of different socially salient groups (henceforth: group discrimination) are wrongful. This means that people subjected to group discrimination are often wronged, and this bears importantly on whether such acts are morally impermissible. The three main accounts of what makes group discrimination wrongful appeal to considerations of harm, disrespect, and social relations of inequality, respectively. While each of them can explain the wrongfulness of some paradigmatic instances of wrongful direct discrimination, they explain the wrongfulness of a set of three important non-paradigmatic forms of discrimination indirect discrimination, implicit bias, and algorithmic discrimination less well. Overall, the prospects of a monistic account of the wrongfulness of discrimination are bleak. This Element critically examines leading normative accounts of group discrimination-harm, disrespect, and inequality-and their explanatory limits in non-paradigmatic cases such as indirect, implicit, and algorithmic discrimination. It argues against the viability of a unified theory of wrongfulness. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781009596756