Today the majority of philosophers in the English-speaking world adhere to the "naturalist" credos that philosophy is continuous with science, and that the natural sciences provide a complete account of all that exists - whether human or non-human. The new faith says science, not man, is the measure of all things. However, there is a growing scepticism about the adequacy of this complacent orthodoxy. This volume presents a group of leading thinkers who criticise scientific naturalism not in the name of some form of supernaturalism, but in order to defend a more inclusive or liberal naturalism. The many prominent Anglo-American philosophers appearing in this book - Akeel Bilgrami, Stanley Cavell, Donald Davidson, John Dupre, Jennifer Hornsby, Erin Kelly, John McDowell, Huw Price, Hilary Putnam, Carol Rovane, Barry Stroud, and Stephen White - do not march in lockstep, yet their contributions demonstrate mutual affinities and various unifying themes. Instead of attempting to force human nature into a restricted scientific image of the world, these papers represent an attempt to place human nature at the centre of renewed - but still scientifically respectful - conceptions of philosophy and nature.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
It is a remarkably congenial collection of papers by a distinguished lineup of philosophers. There are two different types of argument to be found in these papers. The first shows how an uncritical adoption of this orthodox naturalist institution either misconstrues or underdetermines phenomena such as science itself, the mind, agency, ethics, and personal identity. On the second line, what is needed to avoid straying into the impasses of underdetermination (as the orthodox naturalist does) and dualism (as the normativist does) is a fresh and unbiased look at our conception of 'nature, ' 'the natural, ' 'naturalism, ' and kindred concepts such as those of 'dispositions, ' 'causation, ' and 'science'...The result is a critical view of the explanans that is taken for granted by the orthodox naturalist, and used by the normativist as a foil for defining normative relations. Pursuing this line of argument is necessary if we want to avoid the shortcomings of both orthodox naturalist and nor
Mario De Caro is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Universita Roma Tre. David Macarthur is a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sydney.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Grey Matter Books, Hadley, MA, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. Signed and inscribed by David Macarthur on the first free end page. Text is unmarked; pages are bright, though the top edge of the pages is lightly foxed. Binding is sturdy. Dust jacket is lightly edge worn. Inscribed by Author. Seller Inventory # 071697
Seller: WeBuyBooks, Rossendale, LANCS, United Kingdom
Condition: Very Good. Most items will be dispatched the same or the next working day. A copy that has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. Seller Inventory # rev8684872825
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, United Kingdom
hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Very Good .Ships From Multiple Locations. book. Seller Inventory # ERICA791067401295X3
Quantity: 1 available