Review:
This new study ... makes a lively and challenging contribution to the literature on reception, as well as to our understanding of the events it describes. (Church Times)
There are patterns and paradigms here which are instructive for struggles of our own time. (Church Times)
The conclusions Williams has drawn emerge from an extremely detailed and careful reconstruction of the religious situation in Milan and of Ambrose's episcopate. It is impossible to exaggerate the difficulties involved in such a reconstruction...Prof. Williams's book repays careful study and reminds us of the simple reality that in the history of the church theology and politics cannot be severed. (Anglican Theological Review)
complex and challenging study...the author's coverage of the subject is thorough, nicely organised, and well written...anyone interested in late Roman western religion, theological issues, and Ambrosian Milan will find it an important and even compelling study (The Historian)
complex and challenging study...The author's coverage of the subject is thorough, nicely organized, and well written...Not all readers will thrill to this work; yet, anyone interested in late Roman western religion, theological issues, and Ambrosian Milan will find it an important and even compelling study. (The Historian)
It is a measure of William's achievement that on completing this book, one wonders how the generally accepted scholarly consensus on this matter could ever have been so misguided and simplistic. Williams has not only blown the dust off this concensus, he has completely overturned it. He is not only sensitive to, but prepared to confront and tackle, the complexities of fourth-century ideology, its councils and creed, imperial edicts and the changing role of its bishops. (The Expository Times)
Williams's work ... will be warmly by professional historians and graduate students interested in early church history ... His scholarship is broad and deep. Williams's Ambrose is in no sense a biography of Ambrose. It is alone in English as a critical historical account of the Ambrose-Homoian conflict in Milan. (E. Robert Geehan, United States Military Academy, History. Spring 1996)
complex and challenging study ... The author's coverage of the subject is thorough, nicely organized, and well written. Williams does a great deal to rediscover the "historical Ambrose" by thoroughly examining such matters as his episcopal election, his dismissal of a Homoian priest, and his leadership of the difficult and counter-productive Council of Aquileia ... anyone interested in late Roman western religion, theological issues, and Ambrosian Milan will find it an important and even compelling study. (Jan T. Hallenbeck, Ohio Wesleyan University, The Historian)
enormous accomplishment (Michel René Barnes, Marquette University, Journal of Religion, April 1997)
a succinct and well-reasoned account of the rise and fall of "Arianism" ... W. has presented a well-researched and convincing thesis ... W's study should prove fundamental to any future discussion of Western Arianism and Ambrose of Milan's role in the establishment of Nicene orthodoxy. (David G Hunter, Theological Studies)
About the Author:
Daniel H. Williams is Assistant Professor of Theology at Loyola University, Chicago.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.