There are various opinions on the relevance of the United Nations concerning the authorisation of the use of force. Idealists demand UN authorisation for any type of intervention and strict adherence to a narrow interpretation of international law. Realists have a more sceptical stance, arguing that international law and international institutions are only successful under specific circumstances. Neoconservatives defy international law and international institutions. These arguments are compared and then applied to several case studies. It is explained why unilateralist thinking is not viable; why the use of force in circumvention of the UN framework is never legal; and that cases where intervention is illegal but legitimate necessitate reform of international laws and institutions.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
The Author: Noele Crossley received a Mag. phil. in Political Science from the University of Vienna. Her main research interests are International Organisations and International Security. She has worked in the private and public sectors and is currently serving at the United Nations Headquarters in New York.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
£ 9.99
From Germany to U.S.A.
Shipping:
£ 9.98
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Seller: Fundus-Online GbR Borkert Schwarz Zerfaß, Berlin, Germany
Originalbroschur. Condition: Sehr gut. 138 S. Ein gutes und sauberes Exemplar. - Contents: Idealists, the Just War, and the Right Authority Idealists and the Legitimate Use of Force Game Theory in International Law National Interest as an Obstacle to Positivist International Law The United Nations as a Tool Neoconservatives and the Threat Emanating from International Law Neoconservatives and the Legitimate Use of Force Diverging Perspectives on Self-Defence: The Gulf War; the Iraq War Diverging Perspectives on Humanitarian Intervention: The Rwanda Crisis; the Kosovo Conflict The Authority of the UN in a Unipolar World: the Iranian Nuclear Dispute; the Darfur Conflict. ISBN 9783631577929 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 221. Seller Inventory # 1027051
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Roland Antiquariat UG haftungsbeschränkt, Weinheim, Germany
Softcover. 1. 138 S. ; 21 cm Unread book. Very good condition. 9783631577929 Sprache: Deutsch Gewicht in Gramm: 222. Seller Inventory # 208842
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Condition: NEW. In. Seller Inventory # ria9783631577929_new
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Condition: NEW. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book. Seller Inventory # ria9783631577929_lsuk
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, U.S.A.
paperback. Condition: Very Good. Seller Inventory # mon0003537923
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -There are various opinions on the relevance of the United Nations concerning the authorisation of the use of force. Idealists demand UN authorisation for any type of intervention and strict adherence to a narrow interpretation of international law. Realists have a more sceptical stance, arguing that international law and international institutions are only successful under specific circumstances. Neoconservatives defy international law and international institutions. These arguments are compared and then applied to several case studies. It is explained why unilateralist thinking is not viable; why the use of force in circumvention of the UN framework is never legal; and that cases where intervention is illegal but legitimate necessitate reform of international laws and institutions. 138 pp. Seller Inventory # 9783631577929
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - There are various opinions on the relevance of the United Nations concerning the authorisation of the use of force. Idealists demand UN authorisation for any type of intervention and strict adherence to a narrow interpretation of international law. Realists have a more sceptical stance, arguing that international law and international institutions are only successful under specific circumstances. Neoconservatives defy international law and international institutions. These arguments are compared and then applied to several case studies. It is explained why unilateralist thinking is not viable; why the use of force in circumvention of the UN framework is never legal; and that cases where intervention is illegal but legitimate necessitate reform of international laws and institutions. Seller Inventory # 9783631577929
Quantity: 2 available