A Clash of Cultures: Civil-Military Relations during the Vietnam War (In War and in Peace: U.S. Civil-Military Relations) - Hardcover

Schwab, Orrin

Hardcover

ISBN 10: 0275984710 ISBN 13: 9780275984717

Publisher: Praeger, 2006

Synopsis

The Vietnam War was in many ways defined by a civil-military divide, an underlying clash between military and civilian leadership over the conflict's nature, purpose and results. This book explores the reasons for that clash-and the results of it. The relationships between the U.S. military, its supporters, and its opponents during the Vietnam War were both intense and complex. Schwab shows how the ability of the military to prosecute the war was complicated by these relationships, and by a variety of nonmilitary considerations that grew from them. Chief among these was the military's relationship to a civilian state that interpreted strategic value, risks, morality, political costs, and military and political results according to a different calculus. Second was a media that brought the war-and those protesting it-into living rooms across the land. As Schwab demonstrates, Vietnam brought together two leadership groups, each with very different operational and strategic perspectives on the Indochina region. Senior military officers favored conceptualizing the war as a conventional military conflict that required conventional means to victory. Political leaders and critics of the war understood it as an essentially political conflict, with associated political risks and costs. As the war progressed, Schwab argues, the divergence in perspectives, ideologies, and political interests created a large, and ultimately unbridgeable divide between military and civilian leaders. In the end, this clash of cultures defined the Vietnam War and its legacy for the armed forces and for American society as a whole.

About this title

Review:

?Military obedience to civilian authority has been one of the fundamental foundations of US society, a bedrock principle that has never been seriously challenged. Occasionally, in times of war or prelude to war, however, civil-military relations have become strained or adversarial. During the Vietnam War, particularly deep disagreements divided the military from civilian political leaders, the media, and the general public. The dominant military interpretation of Vietnam was and is that militarily unsound civilian decisions and limitations tragically prevented the military from winning a winnable war. Because the US is again in the middle of a contentious, inconclusive conflict that many think resembles the Vietnam War, and because so little of the voluminous military writing and thinking about Vietnam gets wide public notice, this is an important topic....Recommended. All levels/libraries.?-Choice

?"Two cultures, one grounded in military history and institutions, the other, founded in the political and social milieu of post-Second World War America, diverged over the Vietnam War," argues Schwab in his examination of the evolution of civil-military relations in the American government over the course of the war. This clash between these two ideologies and cultures resulted in a situation where military solutions to the conflict became irreconcilable with political solutions, forcing strategic and operational compromises that led inexorably to defeat for the United States and damage to both the military and wider civilian cultures.?-Reference & Research Book News

""Two cultures, one grounded in military history and institutions, the other, founded in the political and social milieu of post-Second World War America, diverged over the Vietnam War," argues Schwab in his examination of the evolution of civil-military relations in the American government over the course of the war. This clash between these two ideologies and cultures resulted in a situation where military solutions to the conflict became irreconcilable with political solutions, forcing strategic and operational compromises that led inexorably to defeat for the United States and damage to both the military and wider civilian cultures."-Reference & Research Book News

"Military obedience to civilian authority has been one of the fundamental foundations of US society, a bedrock principle that has never been seriously challenged. Occasionally, in times of war or prelude to war, however, civil-military relations have become strained or adversarial. During the Vietnam War, particularly deep disagreements divided the military from civilian political leaders, the media, and the general public. The dominant military interpretation of Vietnam was and is that militarily unsound civilian decisions and limitations tragically prevented the military from winning a winnable war. Because the US is again in the middle of a contentious, inconclusive conflict that many think resembles the Vietnam War, and because so little of the voluminous military writing and thinking about Vietnam gets wide public notice, this is an important topic....Recommended. All levels/libraries."-Choice

"Schwab's argument is broadly convincing and his book is impressive in placing the civil-military clash in a broad context. While civil-military relations are often narrowly conceived as being the relations between those at the very top, Schwab's decision to examine many facets of the relationship is laudable. Therefore this book is invaluable as an introduction to civil-military relations during the ware, and as a basis for further research. It answers some important questions, but it also raises more."-Journal of American Studies

Synopsis:

This study depicts the intense and complex relationship between the U.S. military and both its supporters and opponents in American civil society during the Vietnam War. The ability of the U.S. military to prosecute the war was complicated by its relationship to a civilian state that interpreted the strategic value, risks, morality, political costs, and military and political results according to a different set of values. The conduct of the war represented complex compromises between military and civilian leaderships that reflected an underlying clash over the whole perspective on the conflict, its nature, purpose and results. Throughout the Vietnam War era, the military faced the extraordinary political context of limited wars in the modern era, where military planning has to calculate the impact of television as an instrument used both to perceive the war and to project the actions and ideas of a large domestic antiwar movement. The author argues that divergent ideological systems determined the specific nature of U.S. intervention. The political context of U.S. intervention, namely the disastrous relationships among the military, the Nixon administration, and the hostile antiwar blocs in the Congress and in American society, would not allow for any other outcome than what occurred in April 1975.

The civil-military divide thus defined the Vietnam War and its legacy to the post-Vietnam armed forces and to American society as a whole.

About this edition

• Publisher: Praeger
• Publication date: 2006
• ISBN 10: 0275984710
• ISBN 13: 9780275984717
• Binding: Hardcover
• Edition number: 1
• Number of pages: 214