The Toughest Indian In The World - Softcover

Alexie, Sherman

Softcover

ISBN 10: 0099286270 ISBN 13: 9780099286271

Publisher: Vintage, 2001

Synopsis

In these stories we meet the kinds of American Indians we rarely see in literature---the upper and middle class, the professionals and white-collar workers, the bureaucrats and poets, falling in and out of love and wondering if they will make their way home. A Spokane Indian journalist transplanted from the reservation to the city picks up a hitchhiker, a Lummi boxer looking to take on the toughest Indian in the world. A Spokane son waits for his diabetic father to return from the hospital, listening to his father's friends argue over Jesus' carpentry skills as they build a wheelchair ramp. An estranged interracial couple, separated in the midst of a traffic accident, rediscover their love for each other. A white drifter holds up an International House of Pancakes, demanding a dollar per customer and someone to love, and emerges with forty-two dollars and an overweight Indian he dubs Salmon Boy.Alexie's is a voice of remarkable passion, and these stories are love stories - between parents and children, white people and Indians, movie stars and ordinary people. Witty, tender, and fierce, the toughest Indian in the world is a virtuoso performance.

About this title

Synopsis:

In these stories, we meet the kinds of American Indians we rarely see in literature - the upper and middle class, the professionals and white-collar workers, the bureaucrats and poets, falling in and out of love and wondering if they will make their way home.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.:

In a shortish working career of a little over two decades, Orwell produced nearly two million published words. The twenty volumes that Peter Davison's monumental Complete Works needed to accommodate them take up nearly four feet of shelf space. If he lived to be seventy, Orwell once proposed, comparing his professional output with that of the average coal-miner, the chances were that he would leave a shelf-full of books. He died young, the novels and essays that would have occupied his fifties and sixties were never written, and yet posthumously at any rate, with the help of devoted editors and compilers, he achieved his ambition. Again - and these comparisons say something about the way in which his mind worked - Orwell once calculated that the lifetime output for a prolific writer of boys' school stories would, were the pages to be lined end to end, have carpeted the best part of an acre. His own oeuvre spread out sheet by sheet would occupy an area roughly the size of Norwich city centre. The fifty years since his death have brought perhaps two million words more: biographies, critical studies, memoirs by literary colleagues and childhood friends, even a novel (David Caute's Dr Orwell and Mr Blair) in which he plays a starring role. Why add to them?
Thackeray once declared that when he read a book all that remained in his head was a picture of the author. This defies all known precepts of modern literary theory, but the point remains. Orwell has obsessed me for the best part of a quarter of a century. The first 'adult' novel I ever picked off the bookshelf in my parents' house was a Penguin paperback of A Clergyman's Daughter that some ineluctable instinct had led my mother to buy in the early 1960s. The GCSE O-level English paper essay that I prophetically set out on a year or so later was: 'Whose biography would you most like to write?' Always in my adolescence, Orwell was there, the ghostly figure on the back of the book jacket urging me on. The sense of sheer personality that rises from his work - that urgent need to communicate vital things - is immensely strong, all the more so if you are a teenager who barely knows that books exist.
'He knows all about me,' you feel, 'he wrote this for me' - which, curiously enough, is what Orwell himself wrote about Henry Miller. Were I ever to meet his shade in the celestial equivalent of the Groucho Club - not, you suspect, somewhere Orwell would ever allow himself to be found - I should say what Philip Larkin maintained that he said to Cyril Connolly when the two of them were introduced at Auden's memorial service: 'Sir, you formed me.' Cheap Penguins in those days, procurable at fifty pence a throw from the University of East Anglia bookshop, the four volumes of Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus' Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters were my private cornucopia in the sixth-form years, a vast, sprawling bran tub into which repeated scoops yielded up anything but bran. Dickens, Thackeray, Gissing, Smollett, hosts of minor writers washed up on the early-twentieth-century shore: hardly any of the people who came to occupy my mental lumber room would have taken up residence!
there had it not been for Orwell.
There was more to it than this, of course. Marking down Orwell's collected works as a hugely idiosyncratic version of the Good Book Guide is perhaps the equivalent of regarding Sir Winston Churchill as a moderately effective leader of the Conservative Party. For Orwell is, above all, a moral force, a light glinting in the darkness, a way through the murk. His status as a kind of ethical litmus paper stems not so much from the repeated injunctions to 'behave decently', and some of the implications of behaving decently for the average western lifestyle, as from the armature that supported them. Broadly speaking he realised - and he did so a great deal earlier than most commentators of either Right or Left - that the single most important crisis of the twentieth century was the decline in mass religious belief and, its corollary, in personal immortality. God was dead and yet the secular substitutes put in His place, whether totalitarianism or western consumer capitalism, merely!
travestied human ideals and aspirations. The task facing modern man, as Orwell saw it, was to take control of that immense reservoir of essentially spiritual feeling - all that moral sensibility looking for a home - and use it to irrigate millions of ordinary and finite lives. The atrocities of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia - and this point is repeated endlessly in his later writings - could only have been designed by the godless because they presuppose a world in which there is no moral reckoning, and where the only power that matters is the ability to control not only your fellow men but the history of which they are a part and the knowledge on which that history rests. The idea that there was a life after death was unsustainable, but the moral baggage that accompanied that belief was indispensable. As it happens, and for reasons it is superfluous to explore here, I don't believe that God is altogether dead, but I do believe in the materials which Orwell used to construct his opposition to - that eternally memorable phrase from an essay published in 1940 - 'the smelly little orthodoxies which are now contending for our souls'. It is worth pointing out that these orthodoxies still exist sixty years later, if in rather different forms and wearing yet more elaborate disguises, and that it is our duty to resist them with exactly the same vigour with which Orwell resisted Hitler and Stalin.

About this edition

• Publisher: Vintage
• Publication date: 2001
• ISBN 10: 0099286270
• ISBN 13: 9780099286271
• Binding: Paperback
• Number of pages: 256