"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
£ 2.36
Within U.S.A.
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. Brand New Copy. Seller Inventory # BBB_new0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. New. Seller Inventory # Wizard0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. New Copy. Customer Service Guaranteed. Seller Inventory # think0700610626
Book Description Softcover. Condition: new. We take for granted today the tremendous power of the Supreme Court to interpret our laws and overrule any found in conflict with the Constitution Yet our nation was a quartercentury old before that power of judicial review was fully articulated by the Court itself in Marbury v Madison 1803 William Nelsons concise study of that landmark case provides an insightful and readable guide for students and general readers alikeOn the surface the case itself seems a minor one at best William Marbury a lastminute judicial appointee of outgoing Federalist president John Adams demanded redress from the Supreme Court when his commission was not delivered But Chief Justice John Marshall could clearly see the danger his demand posed for a weak court filled with Federalist judges Wary of the Courts standing with the new Republican administration of Thomas Jefferson Marshall hit upon a solution that was both principled and pragmatic He determined that while Marbury was justified in his suit the law on which his claim was based was in conflict with the Constitution It was the first time that the Court struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review which designates the Court as chief interpreter of the ConstitutionNelson relates the story behind Marbury and explains why it is a foundational case for understanding the Supreme Court He reveals how Marshall deftly avoided a dangerous political confrontation between the executive and judicial branches by upholding the rule of law He also shows how Marshall managed to shore up the Courts prestige and power rather than have it serve partisan political agendasNelson clarifies how the Marshall court sought to preserve what was best in eighteenthcentury constitutionalism while accommodating nineteenthcentury political realities and also traces the gradual transformation of Marburystyle judicial review since Marshalls timeAlthough the Supreme Court did not assert its power of judicial review for another fiftyfour years after Marbury it has since then invalidated numerous acts of Congress From Marshalls modest bid for consensus to what some consider the modern Courts activist excesses judicial review has been a cornerstone in the edifice of the federal judiciary Nelsons analysis helps us better understand how this fundamental principle emerged and why it still matters. Seller Inventory # DADAX0700610626
Book Description Condition: new. Seller Inventory # FrontCover0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. New. Fast Shipping and good customer service. Seller Inventory # Holz_New_0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. Prompt service guaranteed. Seller Inventory # Clean0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: new. Buy for Great customer experience. Seller Inventory # GoldenDragon0700610626
Book Description Paperback. Condition: New. Brand New!. Seller Inventory # VIB0700610626
Book Description Condition: New. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title! 0.5. Seller Inventory # Q-0700610626