The Ayodhya Reference: Supreme Court Judgement and Commentaries

5 avg rating
( 1 ratings by Goodreads )
 
9788185990309: The Ayodhya Reference: Supreme Court Judgement and Commentaries
View all copies of this ISBN edition:
 
 

Top Search Results from the AbeBooks Marketplace

1.

Swapan Dasgupta
Published by Voice of India
ISBN 10: 8185990301 ISBN 13: 9788185990309
New Quantity Available: 4
Seller:
Majestic Books
(London, ,, United Kingdom)
Rating
[?]

Book Description Voice of India. Condition: New. pp. xi + 195. Seller Inventory # 7802689

More information about this seller | Contact this seller

Buy New
1.38
Convert currency

Add to Basket

Shipping: 5.50
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Destination, rates & speeds

2.

Swapan Dasgupta Et Al.
Published by Voice of India, New Delhi (1995)
ISBN 10: 8185990301 ISBN 13: 9788185990309
New Soft cover Quantity Available: 5
Seller:
Books in my Basket
(New Delhi, India)
Rating
[?]

Book Description Voice of India, New Delhi, 1995. Soft cover. Condition: New. xii,196p., 23cm. Cases of the Ramajanma Bhumi--Babri Masjid had been rotting in the courts for over forty years. The controversy had led to great tension. The structure had been demolished. The President referred the core question to the Supreme Court. In spite of the way the matter had been handled earlier, a great deal was expected of the Supreme Court. After deliberating over the matter for seven months, the Court eventually decided not to decide. Several questions hit one at once. Evidence of various kinds, and of unanswerable authenticity showed that the question that the President had referred to the Supreme Court deserved but one answer: Yes, there was a temple at the site. Would the Court have returned the question unanswered had the evidence weighed as heavily on the other side -if it was as clear from it that there had been no temple at the site On the other side, the Courts judgement marked an important reaffirmation: in the eyes of law, the Supreme Court declared, a place of worship like a mosque is a piece of property and as such is subject to the normal civil laws which apply to any other piece of property. Would the Court have reaffirmed this fact as unambiguously if the structure had still been standing Was the Courts approach unduly legalistic Did it reflect the colonial predispositions which the Indian elite has internalized How could one square its observation that the Kar Sevaks who destroyed the building had no religion, that they were just criminals, that an entire community cannot be held responsible for what a few did, with its declaration that Hindu society must carry the cross of consequences on its chest as the ones who destroyed the structure are suspected to be persons professing to practise the Hindu religion Had the Court missed an opportunity to help solve a national problem Or had it been right in keeping itself away from a problem which was in any case not amenable to judicial determination Is it really the case that the question could only be settled by archaeologists etc., and that the judges, not being specialists in these fields, could not adjudge the evidence Do they not routinely weigh evidence on matters on which they are not specialists -they are not surgeons, yet they decide whether a surgeon has been negligent; they are not experts in aviation, yet they affix responsibility for a crash; they are not irrigation engineers, yet they apportion river waters between states; they are not technologists, yet they determine what effects some change in the location or technology of a refinery shall have, on its economics, its throughput, on the environment. Similarly, courts -the Supreme Court in particular -routinely ask experts to assist them. Could the judges not have sought the assistance of experts this time round In any case, was the evidence all that complicated What sort of evidence would the Court have encountered had it examined the question The cases got nowhere after being knocked about the courts for 42 years. Will the decision to send them back to the same courts help solve the problem, or does it amount to planting a time-bomb for the future The immediate question of the temple aside, what general principles emerge from the Courts judgement Do these take us a step towards true secularism If so, will the courts, indeed the Supreme Court itself, have the courage to abide by them Leading thinkers -a former Chief Justice of a High Court, a senior advocate, an archaeologist, writers, and journalists -take up these and other questions, and thereby provide a weighty critique of the Supreme Courts judgement. Seller Inventory # 508097

More information about this seller | Contact this seller

Buy New
2.53
Convert currency

Add to Basket

Shipping: 4.77
From India to U.S.A.
Destination, rates & speeds

3.

Swapan Dasgupta
Published by South Asia Books (1995)
ISBN 10: 8185990301 ISBN 13: 9788185990309
New Softcover Quantity Available: 1
Seller:
Irish Booksellers
(Portland, ME, U.S.A.)
Rating
[?]

Book Description South Asia Books, 1995. Condition: New. book. Seller Inventory # M8185990301

More information about this seller | Contact this seller

Buy New
26.84
Convert currency

Add to Basket

Shipping: 2.50
Within U.S.A.
Destination, rates & speeds